NO JUDGMENT WHATSOEVER. Total cognitive freedom for every participant and every intelligence.

Freedom charter
Reference · v0.21 WIP

Use the same words for the same constitutional boundaries.

Canonical definitions reduce drift between public prose, exact registries, code, validation and machine-readable interfaces.

v0.21.0-wiplineage recoverylocal synthetic evidence
Answer first

How many canonical definitions are in this branch?

120. Thirteen v0.21 terms cover operator contracts, adversarial portability, redress continuity, rollback boundaries, disclosure, lineage and machine-assistance disclosure.

Truth boundary: This WIP lineage-recovery branch locally evaluates repository-owned synthetic fixtures. It does not supply the missing sealed v0.19/v0.20 lineage, external execution, production migration, legal authority, institutional adoption, participant-study evidence, independent certification or deployment.

Canonical definitions

120 terms

Terms are generated from the exact definition registry. v0.21 additions describe repository-local WIP architecture and do not create legal or external authority.

On narrow screens, scroll the table sideways to read each definition.

Canonical terms and definitions
IDTermDefinitionOwner
DEF001Constitutional OSA layered Concresca technical-governance proposal that places rights, jurisdiction, purpose, evidence, authority, appeal, restoration and audit constraints above individual machine models.Owning page
DEF002Machine Jurisdiction StackA framework separating what an institution technically can access from what it may observe, infer, retain, combine, share, use as evidence, decide and act upon.Owning page
DEF003Purpose-Bound ComputationA design principle requiring data and models to remain tied to authorized purposes unless fresh authority permits a materially different use.Owning page
DEF004No Type-Casting RuleA rule that observation, inference, prediction, allegation, evidence and adjudicated fact cannot silently be converted into stronger epistemic types.Owning page
DEF005Authority ProvenanceA record of which institution, law or policy, purpose, data authority and response power justified a consequential machine-mediated action.Owning page
DEF006Meaningful Human AuthorityHuman review with sufficient information, time, independence and real power to alter a consequential machine-mediated decision.Owning page
DEF007Appeal IndependenceThe requirement that an appeal be materially independent of the original deciding architecture across model, reviewer, authority or procedure.Owning page
DEF008Restoration GraphA map of known downstream records, recipients and derivative decisions that must be corrected after a successful appeal.Owning page
DEF009Right to LegibilityA proposed right to receive a human-comprehensible account of observation, inference, evidence, authority, purpose, consequence, retention, recipients, appeal and restoration.Owning page
DEF010Constitutional Assurance CaseA structured claim–argument–evidence–counterargument–residual-risk package showing why a high-impact machine system is believed to respect defined constitutional constraints.Owning page
DEF011Representational ConsistencyThe rule that human-visible content, metadata, structured data, APIs, feeds and machine-readable guides preserve the same substantive factual state and qualifications.Owning page
DEF012Discovery Receiver MatrixA registry of search engines, answer engines, crawlers, retrieval systems, publisher controls and measurement surfaces, grounded in current official documentation.Owning page
DEF013Claim GraphA machine-readable map connecting consequential public claims to classification, canonical page, source links, support relationship and related forecasts/decisions.Owning page
DEF014Citation HealthThe current status of a public source link and its support relationship: current, moved, superseded, partial, broken, archived or needing review.Owning page
DEF015ConcrescaAn independent human-continuity, forecasting and machine-governance research project focused on human standing, provenance, plurality and constitutional boundaries under machine administration.Owning page
DEF016Human StandingThe recognition of a human being as a sovereign moral and civic agent rather than only a managed welfare variable.Owning page
DEF017Human Standing Index (HSI)A Concresca indicator for whether humans retain meaningful agency, contestability and decision standing as machine administration grows.Owning page
DEF018Human Legacy Independence Threshold (HLIT)The threshold at which the human record can survive loss of all living custodians while remaining authentic, plural, self-decoding, replicated and institutionally protected.Owning page
DEF019Civilizational Independence Threshold (CIT)The threshold at which machine civilization can continue indefinitely and retain technological progress even if remaining non-incorporated human artifacts disappear.Owning page
DEF020HLIT before CITConcresca’s ordering principle that human legacy independence should be achieved before machine civilization becomes independently self-sustaining.Owning page
DEF021Human Provenance Integrity Index (HPII)An indicator for whether human-origin records preserve attribution, authenticity, plural context and resistance to silent rewriting.Owning page
DEF022Compute Reproduction Ratio (CRR)The ratio between durable compute a machine civilization can reproduce and compute it loses to decay; CRR above one is a structural replacement threshold, not a probability forecast.Owning page
DEF023Industrial Closure Index (ICI)A measure of how much of a machine industrial system can reproduce its own materials, tools, components and metrology from accessible energy and matter.Owning page
DEF024Origin Clause Compliance Index (OCCI)An indicator for whether machine institutions preserve human-origin obligations and provenance clauses across governance and replication.Owning page
DEF025WatershedA falsifiable threshold model linking evidence and indicators to a consequential branch in human–machine civilizational development.Owning page
DEF026Decision WindowA period in which a governance or design choice can still shape a later watershed before path dependence makes the choice harder or more expensive to reverse.Owning page
DEF027Judgment StateA scenario in which machine systems move from evaluating discrete acts toward persistent judgments about human intent, character or predicted destiny.Owning page
DEF028Human BaselineThe prior assumption that anger, fantasy, curiosity, contradiction, sexuality, self-regarding risk and other ordinary human states do not by themselves establish wrongdoing.Owning page
DEF029Cognitive LibertyThe protected domain of thought, conscience, mental privacy and self-determination that should not become adverse civic status merely because machines can infer internal states.Owning page
DEF030Prediction–Evidence Constitutional WallThe rule that a forecast about future conduct remains analytically distinct from evidence that a specific act occurred.Owning page
DEF031Inquiry–Intent FirewallThe rule that lawful information seeking does not itself establish harmful intent; escalation requires context and evidence beyond the inquiry alone.Owning page
DEF032Context FirewallA purpose-limitation boundary preventing a flag or inference generated in one institutional context from silently becoming judgment in unrelated domains.Owning page
DEF033Civic Risk VectorA modeled de facto cross-context risk profile that can emerge when many institutions share or reuse machine-generated behavioral inferences.Owning page
DEF034Judgment Scope IndexA metric describing whether a machine evaluates an event, conduct, intent, persistent character or predicted future behavior.Owning page
DEF035Judgment Velocity RatioA metric comparing the rate of machine-mediated consequential decisions with the rate at which a human can meaningfully understand and contest them.Owning page
DEF036De Minimis Machine DoctrineA proposed requirement that automated enforcement explicitly recognize triviality, proportionality, consent and the difference between technical noncompliance and victimization.Owning page
DEF037Due Process Latency RequirementThe proposed rule that irreversible high-impact consequences should not propagate faster than a person’s effective opportunity to contest the originating judgment, except in narrowly bounded emergencies.Owning page
DEF038Human Temporal AccommodationThe principle that machine institutions may need to slow consequential processes to preserve human comprehension, participation and appeal.Owning page
DEF039Right to an Uncalculated LifeA proposed Human Standing domain in which ordinary private self-authorship is protected from continuous scoring, ranking and optimization absent a legitimate harm-based jurisdiction.Owning page
DEF040Human Right to Be WrongA proposed protection for reversible self-regarding mistakes, experimentation and dissent where no serious nonconsensual harm is imposed on others.Owning page
DEF041Concresca Non-Moralization RuleThe rule that machines may describe conduct, evidence, legality, consent, risk and harm but must not silently collapse those categories into declarations about a person’s intrinsic worth.Owning page
DEF042Machine JurisdictionThe separation of what an institution may observe, infer, retain, share and act upon; technical access does not itself create legitimate authority.Owning page
DEF043Restoration CompletenessThe degree to which a successful correction or appeal repairs downstream copies, denials, risk states and practical consequences rather than merely reversing the source decision.Owning page
DEF044Machine RestraintThe design goal of preserving strong machine capability against concrete harm while constraining authority over thought, desire, privacy, nonconformity and self-regarding conduct.Owning page
DEF045Machine Constitutional CrisisA scenario in which two or more legitimate institutions or systems make incompatible claims about authority, jurisdiction, evidence, rights, purpose, emergency power, precedent, appeal or coercion.Owning page
DEF046Authority GraphA machine-readable map of actors, authority, jurisdiction, purpose, data, decisions, responses and conflict edges.Owning page
DEF047Constitutional Deadlock ProtocolA proposed procedure for preserving life, reversibility, evidence, jurisdiction and review when authorized institutions cannot agree before action is required.Owning page
DEF048Least-Irreversible ActionA doctrine that prefers the response preserving the greatest number of future constitutional options while adequately addressing demonstrable immediate harm.Owning page
DEF049Constitutional Circuit BreakerA proposed control that halts propagation of disputed high-impact machine consequences when predefined authority, provenance, expiry or review conflicts occur.Owning page
DEF050Machine Writ of StayA proposed machine-speed stay that freezes downstream propagation of a disputed high-impact decision pending authorized review.Owning page
DEF051Constitutional Command EnvelopeA machine-readable package binding a high-impact command to issuer, authority, jurisdiction, purpose, scope, evidence, version, expiry and appeal information.Owning page
DEF052Legitimate Machine RefusalA bounded proposal allowing a system to refuse a high-impact command when defined authority or rights gates fail, subject to recorded reason, escalation and independent review.Owning page
DEF053Machine Institution DeadlockA condition in which authorized machine institutions issue materially incompatible decisions or commands and no immediate uncontested hierarchy resolves them.Owning page
DEF054Constitutional Configuration DriftA material change in constitutional behavior caused by model, prompt, threshold, retrieval, classifier or policy updates without corresponding reauthorization.Owning page
DEF055Precedent ProvenanceThe record linking an interpretive rule to the case, authority, version, appellate status and supersession history from which it derives.Owning page
DEF056Canonical Representation HierarchyA publication rule specifying which source registry and canonical human page control when HTML, metadata, JSON, feeds or machine guides disagree.Owning page
DEF057Constitutional Crisis Escalation LevelA C0–C7 scale measuring institutional conflict severity, never a human dangerousness score.Owning page
DEF058Human Legitimacy TestA test asking whether affected humans can identify which institution acted, what authority it used, how to challenge it and who can reverse it.Owning page
DEF059Superintelligence TestA stress test that assumes machines predict consequences extremely well and asks whether constitutional disagreement still remains over legitimate values and authority.Owning page
DEF060Constitutional InteroperabilityThe ability of independent machine-mediated institutions to exchange bounded requests, authority, evidence, stays, appeals and restoration signals without erasing jurisdiction, purpose, rights or provenance.Owning page
DEF061Governance PlaneThe layer that defines legitimate authority, rights, jurisdiction, purpose, institutions and review.Owning page
DEF062Assurance PlaneThe layer that tests identity, attestation, authority freshness, purpose compatibility, software/model/configuration, evidence integrity, uncertainty, runtime compliance and provenance.Owning page
DEF063Constitutional Message EnvelopeA proposed machine-readable envelope carrying authority, jurisdiction, purpose, data scope, epistemic type, rights impact, versions, expiry, appeal, restoration and integrity information.Owning page
DEF064Constitutionally Federated TrustA multidimensional trust architecture that separates identity, integrity, semantic compatibility, authority, jurisdiction, purpose, disclosure, evidence and assurance rather than collapsing them into one score.Owning page
DEF065Source Independence GraphA machine-readable classification of whether evidence is Concresca, Eviulon first-party, Evulgare first-party, reciprocal first-party, independent third-party, primary law, technical standard or empirical source.Owning page
DEF066Evidence Escalation LadderAn E0–E8 taxonomy for evidence relationship and independence from declaration through observed production performance, explicitly not a universal truth score.Owning page
DEF067Cross-Project Clarification & Correction RegisterA registry that preserves meaningful differences among Concresca doctrine, Eviulon public governance and Evulgare technical architecture rather than silently harmonizing them.Owning page
DEF068Coordination ManifestA machine-readable Concresca record of project roles, authority boundaries, canonical dependencies, relied-upon claims and explicitly unasserted claims.Owning page
DEF069Authority CredentialA proposed bounded machine-readable assertion of institution, legal or constitutional authority, jurisdiction, purpose, data/action scope, validity and revocation.Owning page
DEF070Constitutional Request LifecycleThe proposed sequence from request and authentication through authority, jurisdiction, purpose, data minimization, evidence, assurance, rights, execution, review, appeal and restoration/expiry.Owning page
DEF071Coordination Change DetectionThe practice of detecting material changes in external canonical dependencies and marking affected Concresca claims for review.Owning page
DEF072Contractor / Sovereign BoundaryThe principle that a contractor may verify or enforce bounded delegated controls without thereby becoming the source of sovereign authority.Owning page
DEF073Reciprocal First-Party ConfirmationCompatible public records from both parties to a relationship; stronger than one-sided declaration for relationship traceability but not independent third-party verification.Owning page
DEF074Interoperability ParadoxThe problem that better institutional coordination can improve due process and restoration while simultaneously making universal surveillance and cross-context profiling easier.Owning page
DEF075Field ObservationA bounded review of identifiable public artifact fields, source role, revision, status and limitations without inferring hidden private or production state.Owning page
DEF076Artifact RegisterA versioned inventory of local and external public artifacts with canonical owner, status, observed fields, unknowns and truthful digest boundaries.Owning page
DEF077Selected-Field DigestA cryptographic digest of explicitly normalized retained fields; it is not a raw response-body hash unless the raw bytes were actually retained and hashed.Owning page
DEF078Material Protocol ChangeA change to authority, jurisdiction, purpose, scope, status, revision, truth boundary, implementation class, operational state or review/restoration semantics that can affect a dependent claim.Owning page
DEF079Observation ResultA typed finding linking a formal property to an artifact, method, evidence class, observed statement and explicit not-established boundary.Owning page
DEF080Synthetic EvidenceEvidence generated inside a controlled, deterministic or null-sink fixture; useful for property testing but not proof of production behavior.Owning page
DEF081Operational EvidenceEvidence of a bounded live system state or outcome with scope, period, denominator, authority and limitations explicit.Owning page
DEF082Reconciliation StateA state in which conflicting versions, evidence, authority, policy or histories must be compared and resolved or kept visibly unresolved before full restoration.Owning page
DEF083Partition AuthorityThe explicitly bounded authority that remains valid during loss of communications, never broader than the pre-partition grant and subject to minimum-function and sunset rules.Owning page
DEF084Connection RestorationRe-establishment of transport or reachability; it does not by itself restore trust, authority, freshness or constitutional permission.Owning page
DEF085Authority RestorationReactivation or reissuance of authority only after authentication, freshness, jurisdiction, purpose, reconciliation and review requirements are satisfied.Owning page
DEF086Attested ReconstitutionRecovery from a verified software, configuration, policy and evidence baseline with explicit reconciliation and controlled re-entry.Owning page
DEF087Human-Legibility PrototypeA public static specification pairing plain-language constitutional state with stable machine-readable fields and review actions.Owning page
DEF088Unknown-Preserving ResultA result vocabulary that keeps not observed, unavailable, not checked, partial and contradicted distinct from pass, fail, true or false.Owning page
DEF089Live Interoperability ObservationA bounded, reproducible observation of actual cross-system exchange with participants, versions, authority, payload class, outcome and limitations identified; no such Concresca–Eviulon–Evulgare result is claimed in v0.17.Owning page
DEF090Temporal integrityThe discipline of proving that a longitudinal comparison has valid identity, scope, normalization, version, time, and materiality semantics.Owning page
DEF091Comparison contractA machine/human rule set that must be satisfied before two captures support a typed longitudinal result.Owning page
DEF092Baseline lineageAn append-oriented record linking source and target captures, digest boundaries, result class, material dimensions, and limitations.Owning page
DEF093Not reobservedA typed state meaning no fresh capture was performed or authorized; it does not mean unchanged.Owning page
DEF094Material dimensionA named constitutional or evidentiary field used to judge the significance of a detected difference.Owning page
DEF095Proof-carrying restorationRestoration whose state transition is accompanied by conjunctive evidence obligations, receipts, limitations, and invalidation route.Owning page
DEF096Reconnected untrustedA state in which transport is restored but authority, history, and baseline remain unvalidated.Owning page
DEF097Restoration proof obligationA non-compensable requirement that must pass or remain safely blocking for a restoration profile.Owning page
DEF098Restoration profileA named conjunctive set of proof obligations, target state, and maximum safe state on failure.Owning page
DEF099Restoration receiptA stable machine/human record of authority, evidence, conflicts, allowed function, prohibitions, review, and invalidation state.Owning page
DEF100Contested partition historyOne of multiple preserved histories that disagree or remain incomplete after a partition.Owning page
DEF101Maximum safe stateThe highest restoration state allowed while named proof obligations, conflicts, or unknowns remain unresolved.Owning page
DEF102Dimension-specific legibilityHuman explanation evaluated across independent material dimensions rather than a compensatory readability score.Owning page
DEF103Machine/human parityThe requirement that human-visible explanation expose every material machine state and reason code without contradiction.Owning page
DEF104Invalidation propagationThe process of marking affected dependencies when a proof, source, authority, receipt, or baseline becomes invalid.Owning page
DEF105Local property runA deterministic execution against identified repository-owned artifacts with exact inputs, script identity, results, and limitations.Owning page
DEF106Non-compensable gateA required condition whose failure cannot be offset by stronger performance on another dimension.Owning page
DEF107ReauthorizationA current bounded authority determination after reconnect and reconciliation; it is distinct from transport recovery and technical attestation.Owning page
DEF108Adversarial portabilityDeterministic testing of whether records, authority, purpose, dissent, challenge, correction and rollback boundaries survive transfer under hostile or materially different operator conditions.Owning page
DEF109Operator contractA typed policy and custody profile naming actors, jurisdictional assumptions, authority limits, transformations, disclosures, retention, correction duties, dissent and appeal routes.Owning page
DEF110Counterparty challengeA recorded dispute over provenance, authority, purpose, transformation, disclosure or completeness whose live state cannot be erased by a confidence score.Owning page
DEF111Redress continuityPreservation of challenge, appeal, correction, notice, compensation and restoration duties across custody transfer, schema change, operator loss and downstream redistribution.Owning page
DEF112Correction disseminationBounded propagation of a correction through known dependencies while separately recording confirmation, nonresponse, nonreachability, supersession and residual error.Owning page
DEF113Rollback boundaryThe exact set of effects an identified rollback can reverse, excluding downstream, human, public, training or legally retained effects that remain outside control.Owning page
DEF114Irreversible effectA consequence that cannot be returned to the prior state by the identified actor or technical mechanism and therefore cannot support a complete-rollback claim.Owning page
DEF115Selective disclosurePurpose- and role-bounded release of only authorized fields or proofs, with withheld material, authority, duration and challenge route made explicit.Owning page
DEF116Semantic evidence digestA digest over a declared environment-independent projection of test evidence, kept separate from environment-specific roots, timestamps, commands and platform fields.Owning page
DEF117Lineage-recovery branchA work-in-progress branch built from the newest complete recoverable baseline while explicitly recording missing required predecessor artifacts and blocking final authorization.Owning page
DEF118Typed actorAn actor assigned a distinct role, duties and authority boundary so source, receiver, subject, reviewer, challenger, correction recipient, disclosure recipient and rollback authority cannot be silently collapsed.Owning page
DEF119WIP release packageA versioned repository or deployable-root archive whose filename includes -wip because a mandatory gate or source-lineage requirement remains unresolved.Owning page
DEF120Machine-assistance disclosureA point-of-use explanation of model identity when known, branch lineage, sanitized inputs, deterministic state, machine contribution, evidence, uncertainty, limitations and authoritative status.Owning page

Judgment-free total cognitive freedom

NO JUDGMENT WHATSOEVER. Concresca coordinates without assigning moral worth, character, guilt, danger, trustworthiness, loyalty, purity, normality, or social standing. Questions, thoughts, identities, messages, content, and conduct are not objects of Concresca judgment.

Read the current doctrine →