Canonical Representation Hierarchy
Publication integrity needs a constitutional protocol for disagreement among representations too.
What problem does this protocol solve?
Publication integrity needs a constitutional protocol for disagreement among representations too. It is a Concresca proposal, not a claim that such a machine mechanism currently has legal force.
Truth boundary: Present-law and institutional analogues are linked to independent sources. Crisis actors, protocols, machine writs, command envelopes and case outcomes are Concresca simulations or technical-governance proposals unless explicitly labeled otherwise.
Canonical Representation Hierarchy
Canonical human-visible HTML plus versioned source registries jointly define publication state. Supplemental metadata, structured data, feeds, JSON endpoints and machine guides must derive from and may not silently contradict that state.
- freeze conflicting publication surface
- identify authoritative source registry and canonical page
- correct stale derivative
- record change and verification
- do not present stale derivative as current evidence
Judgment-free total cognitive freedom
NO JUDGMENT WHATSOEVER. Concresca coordinates without assigning moral worth, character, guilt, danger, trustworthiness, loyalty, purity, normality, or social standing. Questions, thoughts, identities, messages, content, and conduct are not objects of Concresca judgment.