Regulation (EU) 2016/679 — GDPR
Establishes purpose limitation and data minimization principles for covered personal-data processing.
European Union — official/source page ↗A design and governance framework preventing data collected for one purpose from silently becoming authorized for unrelated machine judgment.
It is the proposal that data and models remain tied to an authorized purpose unless fresh authority permits a materially different use. A fraud detector does not automatically become a moral-character engine; age verification does not automatically become sexual-interest profiling.
GDPR establishes purpose limitation and data-minimization principles for covered personal-data processing. Concresca extends the architectural question into inference, cross-context reuse and response authority rather than claiming its broader proposal is current law everywhere.
Purpose tags, access control, separate stores, confidential computing and query auditing may enforce parts of the boundary. Organizational incentives, emergency exceptions and copied data can still defeat purely technical controls.
Source links establish traceability and support. They do not imply that the source endorses Concresca’s constitutional proposals.
Establishes purpose limitation and data minimization principles for covered personal-data processing.
European Union — official/source page ↗Covers human control, procurement, data protection, assurance, lifecycle governance, and responsible AI use.
UK Government — official/source page ↗NO JUDGMENT WHATSOEVER. Concresca coordinates without assigning moral worth, character, guilt, danger, trustworthiness, loyalty, purity, normality, or social standing. Questions, thoughts, identities, messages, content, and conduct are not objects of Concresca judgment.