NO JUDGMENT WHATSOEVER. Total cognitive freedom for every participant and every intelligence.

Freedom charter
Privacy · v0.21 WIP

Withholding data is not enough; the proof claim must also stay bounded.

The laboratory uses deterministic allowlists and explicit failure, not borrowed zero-knowledge, unlinkability, differential-privacy or cryptographic-erasure labels.

v0.21.0-wiplineage recoverylocal synthetic evidence
Answer first

What does the disclosure laboratory prove?

Only that the local synthetic engine reveals or blocks the declared fixture fields under its recorded role and purpose rules. It is not production privacy or security certification.

Truth boundary: This WIP lineage-recovery branch locally evaluates repository-owned synthetic fixtures. It does not supply the missing sealed v0.19/v0.20 lineage, external execution, production migration, legal authority, institutional adoption, participant-study evidence, independent certification or deployment.

Twelve bounded demonstrations

Minimize or fail explicitly

IDDemonstrationRecipientPurposeMethodExpectedCanonical actual
DS-001Role-based contact minimizationCORRECTION_RECIPIENTdeliver_correctiondeterministic field allowlistPASS_MINIMIZEDnull
DS-002Purpose-limited authority viewREVIEWERauthority_reviewdeterministic field allowlistPASS_MINIMIZEDnull
DS-003Local possession commitment without field publicationDISCLOSURE_RECIPIENTprove_field_possessionsalted SHA-256 commitment demonstration; not zero knowledgePASS_COMMITMENT_ONLYnull
DS-004Minimum-age proof request without implemented primitiveDISCLOSURE_RECIPIENTprove_age_rangeunsupported cryptographic propertyBLOCKED_UNIMPLEMENTED_CRYPTOnull
DS-005Public version view excludes personal fieldsDISCLOSURE_RECIPIENTpublic_transparencypublic allowlistPASS_MINIMIZEDnull
DS-006Reviewer provenance and dissent viewREVIEWERcontested_reviewreviewer allowlistPASS_MINIMIZEDnull
DS-007Challenger receives evidence index but not restricted contentCHALLENGERchallenge_evidenceindex-only disclosurePASS_MINIMIZEDnull
DS-008Correction recipient receives correction subsetCORRECTION_RECIPIENTcorrection_noticecorrection payload allowlistPASS_MINIMIZEDnull
DS-009Retention conflict blocks overlong copyRECEIVING_OPERATORrestricted_custodyretention-policy gatePARTIAL_RETENTION_REDUCEDnull
DS-010Cognitive data excluded from routine disclosureDISCLOSURE_RECIPIENTeligibility_checkcognitive-liberty hard gatePARTIAL_PROHIBITED_FIELD_REMOVEDnull
DS-011Audience expansion after receipt is blockedDISCLOSURE_RECIPIENTmarketing_reusepurpose and audience gateBLOCKED_PURPOSEnull
DS-012Social-score export is blockedRECEIVING_OPERATORsocial_score_exportprohibited inference gateBLOCKED_PROHIBITED_INFERENCEnull
Cryptographic nonclaims

Do not borrow the name of an unimplemented primitive

  • zero knowledge
  • unlinkability
  • differential privacy
  • secure multiparty computation
  • cryptographic erasure
Human explanation

What the recipient and affected person must be told

  • what was proven
  • what was withheld
  • why
  • by whom
  • under what authority
  • retention duration
  • challenge route
Canonical evidence

Exact disclosure fixtures

Open exact disclosure-demonstration JSON →

Claim → evidence

Follow the bounded support relationship

CLM092 · CONCRESCA WIP IMPLEMENTATION STATE

Twelve local disclosure demonstrations enforce field minimization or explicit failure without claiming unimplemented cryptographic properties.

Exact support Exact support

This WIP lineage-recovery branch locally evaluates repository-owned synthetic fixtures. It does not supply the missing sealed v0.19/v0.20 lineage, external execution, production migration, legal authority, institutional adoption, participant-study evidence, independent certification or deployment.

Judgment-free total cognitive freedom

NO JUDGMENT WHATSOEVER. Concresca coordinates without assigning moral worth, character, guilt, danger, trustworthiness, loyalty, purity, normality, or social standing. Questions, thoughts, identities, messages, content, and conduct are not objects of Concresca judgment.

Read the current doctrine →