SRC-W3C-01 · standard
PROV-O: The PROV Ontology
Defines a W3C Recommendation for representing provenance entities, activities, and agents.
W3C — official/source page ↗Constitutional OS
Authority Provenance
A machine-readable and human-readable record of who had authority to use which data, for what purpose, under which rule, with which response ceiling.
Technical design proposal / research synthesisFact / proposal boundaries enforcedv0.14.0
Answer first
What is authority provenance?
Evidence provenance asks where information came from. Authority provenance asks who gave the institution the right to use that information in this way. A consequential machine action should identify the institution, legal or policy basis, purpose, permitted data classes, response authority, expiration and reviewer.
Decision record
Authority should be inspectable
A high-impact action should not end with “the model flagged it.” The system must identify the accountable institution and the authority that connects model output to institutional action.
Provenance limit
Origin is not truth or legitimacy
W3C provenance standards are useful for representing entities, activities and agents, but a complete provenance record does not by itself make a claim true or an action legitimate.
Clickable evidence
Sources supporting the factual layer
Source links establish traceability and support. They do not imply that the source endorses Concresca’s constitutional proposals.
SRC-MT-04 · external conceptual reference
Control-to-Evidence Assurance Matrix
Separates declaration, local demonstration, external verification, and operational evidence; provenance alone is not semantic truth.
MachineTradecraft.com — official/source page ↗Judgment-free total cognitive freedom
NO JUDGMENT WHATSOEVER. Concresca coordinates without assigning moral worth, character, guilt, danger, trustworthiness, loyalty, purity, normality, or social standing. Questions, thoughts, identities, messages, content, and conduct are not objects of Concresca judgment.