Primary law
Treaty, EU law, Colorado law, and judicial opinions are scoped to exact propositions.
The v0.36 verification pass tracks treaty text, legislation, technical standards, government oversight, judicial opinions, scholarly research, Concresca interpretation, and unresolved report claims independently.
The previous report-level state UNVERIFIED_PENDING_CLAIM_LEVEL_REVIEW has been replaced by claim-level records. Some propositions now have exact verified scope; others remain partial, interpretive, disputed, or unresolved. None of this converts the sixteen commissioned reports into sixteen independent sources.
Treaty, EU law, Colorado law, and judicial opinions are scoped to exact propositions.
OHTTP and differential privacy are described with applicability limits.
Section 215 findings are tied to the specific program and reform record.
Chilling-effect findings retain observational and generalization limits.
Query sanctuary and cognitive liberty remain explicit Concresca doctrine.
Product behavior, minor-development claims, infrastructure logs, and MATM fields remain open.
NO JUDGMENT WHATSOEVER. Query, thought, identity, content, and participation are never converted into moral rank, character, intent, guilt, danger, trustworthiness, or standing.
Status: PARTIALLY_VERIFIED. Exact propositions are tracked in the claim ledger. Verification of one proposition does not verify an entire report or source family.
Private-query, identity separation, no-profile database, and anti-ratchet controls are current design requirements. They are not represented as deployed production infrastructure.
Local repository, browser, WSGI, and fixture evidence remains separate from MySQL, Passenger, public traffic, outside participation, Eviulon ratification, Patefacere adoption, or Evulgare certification.
Correction route. Challenge a claim through the claim ledger or the public clarification and correction route. One commissioned report family is never counted as independent corroboration.