NO JUDGMENT WHATSOEVER. Total cognitive freedom for every participant and every intelligence.

Freedom charter
UI / UX OBSERVATION

Keep the identity; remove the layout cliffs.

The v0.41 shell preserves the established visual language and approved hero while replacing fixed gutters, fixed column counts, oversized status-first viewports, and detached status tables with fluid interpolation and task-first status structure.

LOCAL BROWSER EVIDENCEJudgment state: NONE

Deep-dive findings

The prior status hero consumed most of the first desktop viewport and all actionable space on mobile. Current status and repair instructions appeared below the fold. Fixed breakpoint grids produced abrupt changes, and the status owner table sat outside the shared content width.

First viewport

Compact status hero, immediate vector, and direct remediation anchor.

Liquid width

Fluid gutters and a 92rem content ceiling support narrow through ultrawide screens.

Fluid type

Clamp-based display and body scales preserve hierarchy without abrupt jumps.

Component flow

Auto-fit grids and container queries adapt to available component width.

Touch and keyboard

Primary controls have at least 44px targets and visible focus.

No-JavaScript

Native details/summary exposes remediation without script.

What remains open

Automated rendering cannot establish comprehension, assistive-technology behavior across all combinations, cognitive load, real low-bandwidth performance, or safety in a coercive household. Those require independently scoped human review.

Automated PASS is not accessibility certification.
EVIDENCE BOUNDARY

Local mechanism, explicit authorization, operational execution, and participant standing remain separate.

Implemented locally

Local screenshots and measured layout assertions at 320, 390, 768, 1024, 1365, 1440, and 1920 CSS pixels.

Not supplied or verified

Independent human accessibility/usability review or production browser telemetry. No tracking was added.

Exact current condition

LOCAL_AUTOMATED_BROWSER_EVIDENCE_ONLY

No participant judgment

Cancellation, refusal, expiry, rollback, correction, and blocked evidence have participant-evaluation and standing effects NONE.

NO JUDGMENT WHATSOEVER. A technical state is not a moral condition.