NO JUDGMENT WHATSOEVER. Total cognitive freedom for every participant and every intelligence.

Freedom charter
Proposed model language

Twelve legislative modules for machine-era due process

Each module now includes research-grade section language for definitions, core rights, scope, exceptions, emergency powers, appeal, audit, enforcement, sunset and anti-circumvention.

Research framework / scenario analysisFact / scenario boundaries enforcedv0.14.0
Answer first

Is this current law or legal advice?

No. This is proposed model language for research and comparison. It is intentionally modular and would require jurisdiction-specific legal drafting, democratic process and professional legal review.

ML-01 · PROPOSED MODEL LANGUAGE

Cognitive Liberty Protection Act

Protect internal thought, belief and sensitive cognitive inference from adverse civic status absent conduct-based legal thresholds.

1. Definitions

“Covered system” means a machine-mediated system used to make or materially shape a consequential decision. “Cognitive State” shall be interpreted according to the narrow purpose of this Act and shall not silently expand through proxy variables.

2. Core right / prohibition

No covered entity shall impose adverse civic status solely because of involuntary thought, private fantasy, belief, or sensitive cognitive inference absent independently established conduct meeting a lawful intervention threshold.

3. Scope and purpose limitation

A covered entity shall document the specific decision purpose, affected population, data categories, inference categories, retention period, recipients and acting authority before deployment.

4. Narrow exceptions

An exception must identify a concrete lawful interest, be necessary and proportionate to that interest, use the least restrictive available means, and may not create a generalized character or social-worth judgment.

5. Emergency clause

Immediate temporary action may occur only to address a defined imminent serious harm when delay would materially increase that harm. Emergency action shall receive rapid independent review and shall not automatically authorize unrelated surveillance.

6. Notice, review and appeal

Affected persons shall receive intelligible notice of observed facts, machine inferences, material rules, proposed consequences, retention and recipients, together with an effective independent contest mechanism.

7. Audit and public accountability

Covered entities shall periodically audit false-positive and false-negative behavior, cross-context reuse, override authority, appeal outcomes, restoration completion and disproportionate effects, while protecting individual privacy.

8. Enforcement

The competent enforcement authority may order cessation, correction, deletion, restoration and proportionate civil remedies. Private rights and agency powers are jurisdiction-specific and require local drafting.

9. Sunset and periodic review

The legislature or regulator shall review this Act and covered categories on a fixed schedule. Emergency or experimental powers expire automatically unless affirmatively renewed after public review.

10. Anti-circumvention

A covered entity may not evade this Act by renaming a prohibited score, routing the same inference through a contractor, using a proxy feature, or dividing a totalizing judgment across interoperable systems.

ML-02 · PROPOSED MODEL LANGUAGE

Prediction–Evidence Separation Act

Prevent risk forecasts and group correlations from substituting for individualized proof of past conduct.

1. Definitions

“Covered system” means a machine-mediated system used to make or materially shape a consequential decision. “Predictive Risk Output” shall be interpreted according to the narrow purpose of this Act and shall not silently expand through proxy variables.

2. Core right / prohibition

No predictive risk score or population correlation shall constitute proof that a natural person committed an act. Serious coercion requires independently verifiable individualized evidence.

3. Scope and purpose limitation

A covered entity shall document the specific decision purpose, affected population, data categories, inference categories, retention period, recipients and acting authority before deployment.

4. Narrow exceptions

An exception must identify a concrete lawful interest, be necessary and proportionate to that interest, use the least restrictive available means, and may not create a generalized character or social-worth judgment.

5. Emergency clause

Immediate temporary action may occur only to address a defined imminent serious harm when delay would materially increase that harm. Emergency action shall receive rapid independent review and shall not automatically authorize unrelated surveillance.

6. Notice, review and appeal

Affected persons shall receive intelligible notice of observed facts, machine inferences, material rules, proposed consequences, retention and recipients, together with an effective independent contest mechanism.

7. Audit and public accountability

Covered entities shall periodically audit false-positive and false-negative behavior, cross-context reuse, override authority, appeal outcomes, restoration completion and disproportionate effects, while protecting individual privacy.

8. Enforcement

The competent enforcement authority may order cessation, correction, deletion, restoration and proportionate civil remedies. Private rights and agency powers are jurisdiction-specific and require local drafting.

9. Sunset and periodic review

The legislature or regulator shall review this Act and covered categories on a fixed schedule. Emergency or experimental powers expire automatically unless affirmatively renewed after public review.

10. Anti-circumvention

A covered entity may not evade this Act by renaming a prohibited score, routing the same inference through a contractor, using a proxy feature, or dividing a totalizing judgment across interoperable systems.

ML-03 · PROPOSED MODEL LANGUAGE

AI Confidant Privacy Act

Create protected confidentiality and strict purpose separation for intimate personal-AI conversations with narrow emergency exceptions.

1. Definitions

“Covered system” means a machine-mediated system used to make or materially shape a consequential decision. “Protected Ai-Confidant Communication” shall be interpreted according to the narrow purpose of this Act and shall not silently expand through proxy variables.

2. Core right / prohibition

A provider shall segregate intimate user-confidant content from generalized risk profiling and shall not sell or transfer psychological risk tags to unrelated institutions.

3. Scope and purpose limitation

A covered entity shall document the specific decision purpose, affected population, data categories, inference categories, retention period, recipients and acting authority before deployment.

4. Narrow exceptions

An exception must identify a concrete lawful interest, be necessary and proportionate to that interest, use the least restrictive available means, and may not create a generalized character or social-worth judgment.

5. Emergency clause

Immediate temporary action may occur only to address a defined imminent serious harm when delay would materially increase that harm. Emergency action shall receive rapid independent review and shall not automatically authorize unrelated surveillance.

6. Notice, review and appeal

Affected persons shall receive intelligible notice of observed facts, machine inferences, material rules, proposed consequences, retention and recipients, together with an effective independent contest mechanism.

7. Audit and public accountability

Covered entities shall periodically audit false-positive and false-negative behavior, cross-context reuse, override authority, appeal outcomes, restoration completion and disproportionate effects, while protecting individual privacy.

8. Enforcement

The competent enforcement authority may order cessation, correction, deletion, restoration and proportionate civil remedies. Private rights and agency powers are jurisdiction-specific and require local drafting.

9. Sunset and periodic review

The legislature or regulator shall review this Act and covered categories on a fixed schedule. Emergency or experimental powers expire automatically unless affirmatively renewed after public review.

10. Anti-circumvention

A covered entity may not evade this Act by renaming a prohibited score, routing the same inference through a contractor, using a proxy feature, or dividing a totalizing judgment across interoperable systems.

ML-04 · PROPOSED MODEL LANGUAGE

Cross-Context Risk Firewall Act

Restrict unrelated reuse and portable behavioral-risk embeddings across institutional domains.

1. Definitions

“Covered system” means a machine-mediated system used to make or materially shape a consequential decision. “Cross-Context Risk Inference” shall be interpreted according to the narrow purpose of this Act and shall not silently expand through proxy variables.

2. Core right / prohibition

A covered entity shall not use a behavioral inference created for one institutional purpose to make an unrelated high-impact decision unless a separately lawful, necessary and proportionate nexus is documented.

3. Scope and purpose limitation

A covered entity shall document the specific decision purpose, affected population, data categories, inference categories, retention period, recipients and acting authority before deployment.

4. Narrow exceptions

An exception must identify a concrete lawful interest, be necessary and proportionate to that interest, use the least restrictive available means, and may not create a generalized character or social-worth judgment.

5. Emergency clause

Immediate temporary action may occur only to address a defined imminent serious harm when delay would materially increase that harm. Emergency action shall receive rapid independent review and shall not automatically authorize unrelated surveillance.

6. Notice, review and appeal

Affected persons shall receive intelligible notice of observed facts, machine inferences, material rules, proposed consequences, retention and recipients, together with an effective independent contest mechanism.

7. Audit and public accountability

Covered entities shall periodically audit false-positive and false-negative behavior, cross-context reuse, override authority, appeal outcomes, restoration completion and disproportionate effects, while protecting individual privacy.

8. Enforcement

The competent enforcement authority may order cessation, correction, deletion, restoration and proportionate civil remedies. Private rights and agency powers are jurisdiction-specific and require local drafting.

9. Sunset and periodic review

The legislature or regulator shall review this Act and covered categories on a fixed schedule. Emergency or experimental powers expire automatically unless affirmatively renewed after public review.

10. Anti-circumvention

A covered entity may not evade this Act by renaming a prohibited score, routing the same inference through a contractor, using a proxy feature, or dividing a totalizing judgment across interoperable systems.

ML-05 · PROPOSED MODEL LANGUAGE

Automated Decision Due Process Act

Require notice, reason, effective contest, override authority and reversible provisional status for consequential automated decisions.

1. Definitions

“Covered system” means a machine-mediated system used to make or materially shape a consequential decision. “Consequential Automated Decision” shall be interpreted according to the narrow purpose of this Act and shall not silently expand through proxy variables.

2. Core right / prohibition

Before irreversible high-impact effect, the affected person shall receive timely notice, specific reasons, meaningful opportunity to contest, and access to a reviewer with authority to reverse the automated decision.

3. Scope and purpose limitation

A covered entity shall document the specific decision purpose, affected population, data categories, inference categories, retention period, recipients and acting authority before deployment.

4. Narrow exceptions

An exception must identify a concrete lawful interest, be necessary and proportionate to that interest, use the least restrictive available means, and may not create a generalized character or social-worth judgment.

5. Emergency clause

Immediate temporary action may occur only to address a defined imminent serious harm when delay would materially increase that harm. Emergency action shall receive rapid independent review and shall not automatically authorize unrelated surveillance.

6. Notice, review and appeal

Affected persons shall receive intelligible notice of observed facts, machine inferences, material rules, proposed consequences, retention and recipients, together with an effective independent contest mechanism.

7. Audit and public accountability

Covered entities shall periodically audit false-positive and false-negative behavior, cross-context reuse, override authority, appeal outcomes, restoration completion and disproportionate effects, while protecting individual privacy.

8. Enforcement

The competent enforcement authority may order cessation, correction, deletion, restoration and proportionate civil remedies. Private rights and agency powers are jurisdiction-specific and require local drafting.

9. Sunset and periodic review

The legislature or regulator shall review this Act and covered categories on a fixed schedule. Emergency or experimental powers expire automatically unless affirmatively renewed after public review.

10. Anti-circumvention

A covered entity may not evade this Act by renaming a prohibited score, routing the same inference through a contractor, using a proxy feature, or dividing a totalizing judgment across interoperable systems.

ML-06 · PROPOSED MODEL LANGUAGE

Human Temporal Accommodation Act

Require consequential machine processes to provide time sufficient for biological humans to understand and contest decisions.

1. Definitions

“Covered system” means a machine-mediated system used to make or materially shape a consequential decision. “Human Temporal Accommodation” shall be interpreted according to the narrow purpose of this Act and shall not silently expand through proxy variables.

2. Core right / prohibition

A consequential machine decision shall not propagate irreversibly faster than a reasonable person can understand and effectively contest it, except under a narrowly defined immediate-harm emergency.

3. Scope and purpose limitation

A covered entity shall document the specific decision purpose, affected population, data categories, inference categories, retention period, recipients and acting authority before deployment.

4. Narrow exceptions

An exception must identify a concrete lawful interest, be necessary and proportionate to that interest, use the least restrictive available means, and may not create a generalized character or social-worth judgment.

5. Emergency clause

Immediate temporary action may occur only to address a defined imminent serious harm when delay would materially increase that harm. Emergency action shall receive rapid independent review and shall not automatically authorize unrelated surveillance.

6. Notice, review and appeal

Affected persons shall receive intelligible notice of observed facts, machine inferences, material rules, proposed consequences, retention and recipients, together with an effective independent contest mechanism.

7. Audit and public accountability

Covered entities shall periodically audit false-positive and false-negative behavior, cross-context reuse, override authority, appeal outcomes, restoration completion and disproportionate effects, while protecting individual privacy.

8. Enforcement

The competent enforcement authority may order cessation, correction, deletion, restoration and proportionate civil remedies. Private rights and agency powers are jurisdiction-specific and require local drafting.

9. Sunset and periodic review

The legislature or regulator shall review this Act and covered categories on a fixed schedule. Emergency or experimental powers expire automatically unless affirmatively renewed after public review.

10. Anti-circumvention

A covered entity may not evade this Act by renaming a prohibited score, routing the same inference through a contractor, using a proxy feature, or dividing a totalizing judgment across interoperable systems.

ML-07 · PROPOSED MODEL LANGUAGE

De Minimis Automated Enforcement Act

Require materiality, proportionality, consent and harm screening before automated sanctions.

1. Definitions

“Covered system” means a machine-mediated system used to make or materially shape a consequential decision. “Automated Enforcement Action” shall be interpreted according to the narrow purpose of this Act and shall not silently expand through proxy variables.

2. Core right / prohibition

Automated enforcement shall apply materiality, proportionality, consent and nonconsensual-harm screening before sanction, and shall prevent cumulative trivial penalties from becoming ruinous.

3. Scope and purpose limitation

A covered entity shall document the specific decision purpose, affected population, data categories, inference categories, retention period, recipients and acting authority before deployment.

4. Narrow exceptions

An exception must identify a concrete lawful interest, be necessary and proportionate to that interest, use the least restrictive available means, and may not create a generalized character or social-worth judgment.

5. Emergency clause

Immediate temporary action may occur only to address a defined imminent serious harm when delay would materially increase that harm. Emergency action shall receive rapid independent review and shall not automatically authorize unrelated surveillance.

6. Notice, review and appeal

Affected persons shall receive intelligible notice of observed facts, machine inferences, material rules, proposed consequences, retention and recipients, together with an effective independent contest mechanism.

7. Audit and public accountability

Covered entities shall periodically audit false-positive and false-negative behavior, cross-context reuse, override authority, appeal outcomes, restoration completion and disproportionate effects, while protecting individual privacy.

8. Enforcement

The competent enforcement authority may order cessation, correction, deletion, restoration and proportionate civil remedies. Private rights and agency powers are jurisdiction-specific and require local drafting.

9. Sunset and periodic review

The legislature or regulator shall review this Act and covered categories on a fixed schedule. Emergency or experimental powers expire automatically unless affirmatively renewed after public review.

10. Anti-circumvention

A covered entity may not evade this Act by renaming a prohibited score, routing the same inference through a contractor, using a proxy feature, or dividing a totalizing judgment across interoperable systems.

ML-08 · PROPOSED MODEL LANGUAGE

Algorithmic Restoration Act

Require source correction, downstream propagation, practical repair and verification after successful appeal.

1. Definitions

“Covered system” means a machine-mediated system used to make or materially shape a consequential decision. “Successful Algorithmic Appeal” shall be interpreted according to the narrow purpose of this Act and shall not silently expand through proxy variables.

2. Core right / prohibition

A successful appeal shall trigger source correction, notice to known downstream recipients, suppression of stale derived status and reasonable practical restoration.

3. Scope and purpose limitation

A covered entity shall document the specific decision purpose, affected population, data categories, inference categories, retention period, recipients and acting authority before deployment.

4. Narrow exceptions

An exception must identify a concrete lawful interest, be necessary and proportionate to that interest, use the least restrictive available means, and may not create a generalized character or social-worth judgment.

5. Emergency clause

Immediate temporary action may occur only to address a defined imminent serious harm when delay would materially increase that harm. Emergency action shall receive rapid independent review and shall not automatically authorize unrelated surveillance.

6. Notice, review and appeal

Affected persons shall receive intelligible notice of observed facts, machine inferences, material rules, proposed consequences, retention and recipients, together with an effective independent contest mechanism.

7. Audit and public accountability

Covered entities shall periodically audit false-positive and false-negative behavior, cross-context reuse, override authority, appeal outcomes, restoration completion and disproportionate effects, while protecting individual privacy.

8. Enforcement

The competent enforcement authority may order cessation, correction, deletion, restoration and proportionate civil remedies. Private rights and agency powers are jurisdiction-specific and require local drafting.

9. Sunset and periodic review

The legislature or regulator shall review this Act and covered categories on a fixed schedule. Emergency or experimental powers expire automatically unless affirmatively renewed after public review.

10. Anti-circumvention

A covered entity may not evade this Act by renaming a prohibited score, routing the same inference through a contractor, using a proxy feature, or dividing a totalizing judgment across interoperable systems.

ML-09 · PROPOSED MODEL LANGUAGE

No Total Character Score Act

Prohibit universal morality, trustworthiness, social-worth or generalized civic-risk scores about natural persons.

1. Definitions

“Covered system” means a machine-mediated system used to make or materially shape a consequential decision. “Total Character Score” shall be interpreted according to the narrow purpose of this Act and shall not silently expand through proxy variables.

2. Core right / prohibition

No covered governmental or high-impact private decision system shall assign a universal human morality, worth, generalized trustworthiness or civic-risk score that combines unrelated life domains.

3. Scope and purpose limitation

A covered entity shall document the specific decision purpose, affected population, data categories, inference categories, retention period, recipients and acting authority before deployment.

4. Narrow exceptions

An exception must identify a concrete lawful interest, be necessary and proportionate to that interest, use the least restrictive available means, and may not create a generalized character or social-worth judgment.

5. Emergency clause

Immediate temporary action may occur only to address a defined imminent serious harm when delay would materially increase that harm. Emergency action shall receive rapid independent review and shall not automatically authorize unrelated surveillance.

6. Notice, review and appeal

Affected persons shall receive intelligible notice of observed facts, machine inferences, material rules, proposed consequences, retention and recipients, together with an effective independent contest mechanism.

7. Audit and public accountability

Covered entities shall periodically audit false-positive and false-negative behavior, cross-context reuse, override authority, appeal outcomes, restoration completion and disproportionate effects, while protecting individual privacy.

8. Enforcement

The competent enforcement authority may order cessation, correction, deletion, restoration and proportionate civil remedies. Private rights and agency powers are jurisdiction-specific and require local drafting.

9. Sunset and periodic review

The legislature or regulator shall review this Act and covered categories on a fixed schedule. Emergency or experimental powers expire automatically unless affirmatively renewed after public review.

10. Anti-circumvention

A covered entity may not evade this Act by renaming a prohibited score, routing the same inference through a contractor, using a proxy feature, or dividing a totalizing judgment across interoperable systems.

ML-10 · PROPOSED MODEL LANGUAGE

Consensual Adult Privacy Protection

Exclude private consensual adult conduct from unrelated civic scoring absent a specific lawful harm nexus.

1. Definitions

“Covered system” means a machine-mediated system used to make or materially shape a consequential decision. “Private Consensual Adult Conduct” shall be interpreted according to the narrow purpose of this Act and shall not silently expand through proxy variables.

2. Core right / prohibition

Private consensual adult sexual conduct shall not be used as an unrelated employment, credit, insurance, border, benefits or civic-standing variable absent a specific lawful harm nexus.

3. Scope and purpose limitation

A covered entity shall document the specific decision purpose, affected population, data categories, inference categories, retention period, recipients and acting authority before deployment.

4. Narrow exceptions

An exception must identify a concrete lawful interest, be necessary and proportionate to that interest, use the least restrictive available means, and may not create a generalized character or social-worth judgment.

5. Emergency clause

Immediate temporary action may occur only to address a defined imminent serious harm when delay would materially increase that harm. Emergency action shall receive rapid independent review and shall not automatically authorize unrelated surveillance.

6. Notice, review and appeal

Affected persons shall receive intelligible notice of observed facts, machine inferences, material rules, proposed consequences, retention and recipients, together with an effective independent contest mechanism.

7. Audit and public accountability

Covered entities shall periodically audit false-positive and false-negative behavior, cross-context reuse, override authority, appeal outcomes, restoration completion and disproportionate effects, while protecting individual privacy.

8. Enforcement

The competent enforcement authority may order cessation, correction, deletion, restoration and proportionate civil remedies. Private rights and agency powers are jurisdiction-specific and require local drafting.

9. Sunset and periodic review

The legislature or regulator shall review this Act and covered categories on a fixed schedule. Emergency or experimental powers expire automatically unless affirmatively renewed after public review.

10. Anti-circumvention

A covered entity may not evade this Act by renaming a prohibited score, routing the same inference through a contractor, using a proxy feature, or dividing a totalizing judgment across interoperable systems.

ML-11 · PROPOSED MODEL LANGUAGE

Lawful Inquiry Protection

Protect lawful reading, research and questioning from adverse status absent independent evidence of harmful preparation.

1. Definitions

“Covered system” means a machine-mediated system used to make or materially shape a consequential decision. “Lawful Inquiry” shall be interpreted according to the narrow purpose of this Act and shall not silently expand through proxy variables.

2. Core right / prohibition

Lawful reading, search, research or questioning shall not alone create adverse civic status or harmful-intent classification. Escalation requires evidence external to the inquiry itself.

3. Scope and purpose limitation

A covered entity shall document the specific decision purpose, affected population, data categories, inference categories, retention period, recipients and acting authority before deployment.

4. Narrow exceptions

An exception must identify a concrete lawful interest, be necessary and proportionate to that interest, use the least restrictive available means, and may not create a generalized character or social-worth judgment.

5. Emergency clause

Immediate temporary action may occur only to address a defined imminent serious harm when delay would materially increase that harm. Emergency action shall receive rapid independent review and shall not automatically authorize unrelated surveillance.

6. Notice, review and appeal

Affected persons shall receive intelligible notice of observed facts, machine inferences, material rules, proposed consequences, retention and recipients, together with an effective independent contest mechanism.

7. Audit and public accountability

Covered entities shall periodically audit false-positive and false-negative behavior, cross-context reuse, override authority, appeal outcomes, restoration completion and disproportionate effects, while protecting individual privacy.

8. Enforcement

The competent enforcement authority may order cessation, correction, deletion, restoration and proportionate civil remedies. Private rights and agency powers are jurisdiction-specific and require local drafting.

9. Sunset and periodic review

The legislature or regulator shall review this Act and covered categories on a fixed schedule. Emergency or experimental powers expire automatically unless affirmatively renewed after public review.

10. Anti-circumvention

A covered entity may not evade this Act by renaming a prohibited score, routing the same inference through a contractor, using a proxy feature, or dividing a totalizing judgment across interoperable systems.

ML-12 · PROPOSED MODEL LANGUAGE

Human Standing in Automated Administration Act

Require high-impact automation to preserve autonomy, meaningful choice, proportionality and domains of self-authorship rather than optimizing only welfare/safety.

1. Definitions

“Covered system” means a machine-mediated system used to make or materially shape a consequential decision. “Human Standing” shall be interpreted according to the narrow purpose of this Act and shall not silently expand through proxy variables.

2. Core right / prohibition

High-impact automated administration shall preserve meaningful agency, contestability, privacy and self-authorship and may not optimize human safety by eliminating all voluntary self-regarding choice.

3. Scope and purpose limitation

A covered entity shall document the specific decision purpose, affected population, data categories, inference categories, retention period, recipients and acting authority before deployment.

4. Narrow exceptions

An exception must identify a concrete lawful interest, be necessary and proportionate to that interest, use the least restrictive available means, and may not create a generalized character or social-worth judgment.

5. Emergency clause

Immediate temporary action may occur only to address a defined imminent serious harm when delay would materially increase that harm. Emergency action shall receive rapid independent review and shall not automatically authorize unrelated surveillance.

6. Notice, review and appeal

Affected persons shall receive intelligible notice of observed facts, machine inferences, material rules, proposed consequences, retention and recipients, together with an effective independent contest mechanism.

7. Audit and public accountability

Covered entities shall periodically audit false-positive and false-negative behavior, cross-context reuse, override authority, appeal outcomes, restoration completion and disproportionate effects, while protecting individual privacy.

8. Enforcement

The competent enforcement authority may order cessation, correction, deletion, restoration and proportionate civil remedies. Private rights and agency powers are jurisdiction-specific and require local drafting.

9. Sunset and periodic review

The legislature or regulator shall review this Act and covered categories on a fixed schedule. Emergency or experimental powers expire automatically unless affirmatively renewed after public review.

10. Anti-circumvention

A covered entity may not evade this Act by renaming a prohibited score, routing the same inference through a contractor, using a proxy feature, or dividing a totalizing judgment across interoperable systems.

Judgment-free total cognitive freedom

NO JUDGMENT WHATSOEVER. Concresca coordinates without assigning moral worth, character, guilt, danger, trustworthiness, loyalty, purity, normality, or social standing. Questions, thoughts, identities, messages, content, and conduct are not objects of Concresca judgment.

Read the current doctrine →