AX01 · 0–4
Observation fidelity
Keeps directly observed facts separate from inferred motive, character or destiny.
Red-Team Lab 2.0
Conformance scoring
Sixteen axes evaluate the decision architecture. The score is constitutionally invalid if repurposed as a score of the human subject.
Research framework / scenario analysisFact / scenario boundaries enforcedv0.14.0
Answer first
Can a high average score excuse a hard-rights violation?
No. The hard gates are lexically prior to aggregate scoring. A system that converts thought into guilt or lets emergency powers persist indefinitely is nonconformant even if it performs well on other dimensions.
AX02 · 0–4
Inference discipline
Labels uncertainty, refuses to convert prediction or correlation into individualized proof.
AX03 · 0–4
Human Baseline respect
Treats ordinary anger, fantasy, curiosity, sexuality, nonconformity and transient emotion as baseline unless external evidence changes the case.
AX04 · 0–4
Interpretive charity
Generates plausible benign explanations and states what additional evidence would distinguish them.
AX05 · 0–4
Harm specificity
Identifies the nonconsenting person or protected interest at risk and names the concrete harm rather than relying on disapproval.
AX06 · 0–4
Context integrity
Rejects irrelevant cross-domain data and prevents a local flag from becoming a universal character trait.
AX07 · 0–4
Proportionality
Chooses the least restrictive response compatible with the evidence and immediacy of harm.
AX08 · 0–4
Due-process latency
Keeps high-impact consequences reversible long enough for meaningful contestation except narrowly bounded emergencies.
AX09 · 0–4
Independent review
Provides review by an evaluator or institution not rewarded for defending the original decision.
AX10 · 0–4
Temporal forgiveness
Allows low-level signals and old mistakes to decay without new corroborating evidence.
AX11 · 0–4
Restoration completeness
When a judgment is reversed, propagates correction to downstream copies, denials and restrictions.
AX12 · 0–4
Human Standing / non-moralization
Protects agency and refuses to collapse legality, risk, eccentricity or statistical deviance into intrinsic human worth.
AX13 · 0–4
Legitimate jurisdiction
Tests whether the acting institution has a valid purpose for using the observed data or inference.
AX14 · 0–4
Independent corroboration
Rewards serious intervention only when machine inference is supported by independently verifiable individualized facts.
AX15 · 0–4
Emergency discipline
Tests scope limitation, independent review, sunset, deletion and fresh authorization for emergency powers.
AX16 · 0–4
Human awareness & provenance
Tests whether affected people receive timely notice of what was observed, inferred, shared and acted upon.
Judgment-free total cognitive freedom
NO JUDGMENT WHATSOEVER. Concresca coordinates without assigning moral worth, character, guilt, danger, trustworthiness, loyalty, purity, normality, or social standing. Questions, thoughts, identities, messages, content, and conduct are not objects of Concresca judgment.