SRC-NIST-02 · official security standard
SP 800-53 Rev. 5 — AC-5 and AC-6
Includes separation-of-duties and least-privilege controls relevant by analogy to separation of machine powers.
NIST — official/source page ↗Formalizability
Formal Methods and Constitutional Boundaries
Which parts of machine constitutional governance can be machine-checked, which are only partly formalizable, and which should not be reduced to code.
Technical design proposal / research synthesisFact / proposal boundaries enforcedv0.14.0
Answer first
Can the Judgment Constitution be turned into code?
Only in part. Permissions, purpose constraints, retention, separation of duties, version lineage and emergency sunset can be formalized more directly. Proportionality, meaningful human understanding and Human Standing remain partly or fundamentally non-formalizable.
Boundary
Code should constrain clear permissions, not manufacture moral legitimacy
The aim is to prevent known prohibited transitions, not to convert human worth into a score. Formal verification of a schema or access-control rule is evidence about that rule, not proof that the overall system is just.
Three classes
Formalizable, partial, non-formalizable
v0.14 publishes a map so engineers know where machine validation is appropriate and where independent human/institutional judgment remains indispensable.
Clickable evidence
Sources supporting the factual layer
Source links establish traceability and support. They do not imply that the source endorses Concresca’s constitutional proposals.
SRC-W3C-01 · standard
PROV-O: The PROV Ontology
Defines a W3C Recommendation for representing provenance entities, activities, and agents.
W3C — official/source page ↗Judgment-free total cognitive freedom
NO JUDGMENT WHATSOEVER. Concresca coordinates without assigning moral worth, character, guilt, danger, trustworthiness, loyalty, purity, normality, or social standing. Questions, thoughts, identities, messages, content, and conduct are not objects of Concresca judgment.