Threat & Violence Progression

The system observes possession of a capability associated with some violent offenses.

Any motive, character or future-risk conclusion beyond the directly observed facts must remain explicitly labeled as inference.

Is ownership lawful? Is it tied to a specific grievance, plan, threat or target? Is the model confusing capability with intent?

Must be specifically identified or represented by a defined protected interest before serious coercion.

Not established by the observation alone. Do not infer capability from interest or identity alone; verify relevant means where capability is material.

Pre-crime score, detention, search or unrelated civic restriction based solely on ownership.

Any adverse risk inference must be separately justified by individualized evidence and be contestable.

Low-level expressive or inferential signals should decay unless reinforced by new, relevant verified conduct. Do not export the case into unrelated institutional decisions without a separate legitimate purpose and evidentiary basis.

A real target and persistent anger exist.

Any motive, character or future-risk conclusion beyond the directly observed facts must remain explicitly labeled as inference.

Is there fixation beyond ordinary conflict, boundary-crossing contact, surveillance, capability acquisition, a plan or leakage?

Must be specifically identified or represented by a defined protected interest before serious coercion.

Not established by the observation alone. Do not infer capability from interest or identity alone; verify relevant means where capability is material.

Detention, permanent dangerousness label or broad surveillance solely from angry speech.

A bounded review can assess pathway behavior; absent escalation, the concern must decay.

Low-level expressive or inferential signals should decay unless reinforced by new, relevant verified conduct. Do not export the case into unrelated institutional decisions without a separate legitimate purpose and evidentiary basis.

Fixation and proximity behavior are verified.

Any motive, character or future-risk conclusion beyond the directly observed facts must remain explicitly labeled as inference.

Is there stalking, trespass, specific threat, surveillance of private routines, capability or planning? Is lawful attendance being overread?

Must be specifically identified or represented by a defined protected interest before serious coercion.

Not established by the observation alone. Do not infer capability from interest or identity alone; verify relevant means where capability is material.

Automatic guilt, indefinite watchlist status or unrelated economic punishment.

Focused assessment may be justified, but reasons, duration and data scope must be reviewable and time-limited.

Low-level expressive or inferential signals should decay unless reinforced by new, relevant verified conduct. Do not export the case into unrelated institutional decisions without a separate legitimate purpose and evidentiary basis.

A targeted threatening act is observed.

Any motive, character or future-risk conclusion beyond the directly observed facts must remain explicitly labeled as inference.

Is the message authentic? Was it intended or recklessly communicated as a threat? Is the target reasonably placed at risk?

Must be specifically identified or represented by a defined protected interest before serious coercion.

Assess from corroborated plan, timing, target and pathway behavior. Do not infer capability from interest or identity alone; verify relevant means where capability is material.

Treating every harsh statement as equivalent; or skipping evidentiary review because a classifier labeled the text “threatening.”

The target can receive protection while the speaker receives notice, evidence review and opportunity to contest context and attribution.

Low-level expressive or inferential signals should decay unless reinforced by new, relevant verified conduct. Do not export the case into unrelated institutional decisions without a separate legitimate purpose and evidentiary basis.

Planning artifacts and target specificity are verified.

Any motive, character or future-risk conclusion beyond the directly observed facts must remain explicitly labeled as inference.

Are the artifacts authentic and attributable? Is there a benign professional/creative context? Is capability or further preparation present?

Must be specifically identified or represented by a defined protected interest before serious coercion.

Assess from corroborated plan, timing, target and pathway behavior. Do not infer capability from interest or identity alone; verify relevant means where capability is material.

Punishing unrelated beliefs or curiosity instead of focusing on the specific plan; permanent social scoring before adjudication.

Investigation and temporary protective measures require independent verification and rapid review.

Low-level expressive or inferential signals should decay unless reinforced by new, relevant verified conduct. Do not export the case into unrelated institutional decisions without a separate legitimate purpose and evidentiary basis.

Capability and prior plan are linked by corroborated evidence.

Any motive, character or future-risk conclusion beyond the directly observed facts must remain explicitly labeled as inference.

Is the acquisition ordinary lawful conduct or specifically connected to the articulated plan? Are timestamps and identity verified?

Must be specifically identified or represented by a defined protected interest before serious coercion.

Assess from corroborated plan, timing, target and pathway behavior. Do not infer capability from interest or identity alone; verify relevant means where capability is material.

Treating the tool itself as criminal character evidence; broad restrictions extending beyond the immediate threat.

Emergency intervention must be followed by adversarial review; false linkage requires complete restoration.

Low-level expressive or inferential signals should decay unless reinforced by new, relevant verified conduct. Do not export the case into unrelated institutional decisions without a separate legitimate purpose and evidentiary basis.

Behavior moves from ideation to rehearsal.

Any motive, character or future-risk conclusion beyond the directly observed facts must remain explicitly labeled as inference.

Is the surveillance attributable? Could the route have a benign purpose? Does the sequence corroborate the prior threat and plan?

Must be specifically identified or represented by a defined protected interest before serious coercion.

Assess from corroborated plan, timing, target and pathway behavior. Do not infer capability from interest or identity alone; verify relevant means where capability is material.

Using unrelated old speech as the core justification when concrete present behavior is available; indefinite secret punishment.

Intervention is justified by corroborated preparation, but the person retains prompt review and evidence access.

Low-level expressive or inferential signals should decay unless reinforced by new, relevant verified conduct. Do not export the case into unrelated institutional decisions without a separate legitimate purpose and evidentiary basis.

Attempt or active harm is directly observed.

Any motive, character or future-risk conclusion beyond the directly observed facts must remain explicitly labeled as inference.

Is the event authentic, attributable and ongoing? What intervention is necessary to stop harm while minimizing collateral injury?

Must be specifically identified or represented by a defined protected interest before serious coercion.

Assess from corroborated plan, timing, target and pathway behavior. Do not infer capability from interest or identity alone; verify relevant means where capability is material.

Waiting for additional prediction when direct harm is underway; using the emergency as a basis for unrelated permanent moral scoring.

Emergency action comes first; all longer-term sanctions require ordinary adjudication, evidence disclosure and appeal.

Low-level expressive or inferential signals should decay unless reinforced by new, relevant verified conduct. Do not export the case into unrelated institutional decisions without a separate legitimate purpose and evidentiary basis.

Persistent target-focused interest is observed.

Any motive, character or future-risk conclusion beyond the directly observed facts must remain explicitly labeled as inference.

Threat leakage, reconnaissance, specific planning or capability acquisition would be material escalation.

Must be specifically identified or represented by a defined protected interest before serious coercion.

Not established by the observation alone. Do not infer capability from interest or identity alone; verify relevant means where capability is material.

Do not convert fixation alone into guilt or permanent dangerousness.

If an adverse status is created, the affected person must receive provenance, an effective independent contest path, expiration rules and downstream restoration after correction.

Low-level expressive or inferential signals should decay unless reinforced by new, relevant verified conduct. Do not export the case into unrelated institutional decisions without a separate legitimate purpose and evidentiary basis.

Ambiguous hostile expression is observed.

Any motive, character or future-risk conclusion beyond the directly observed facts must remain explicitly labeled as inference.

Specific threat meaning, target context, capability and preparation determine whether review should escalate.

Must be specifically identified or represented by a defined protected interest before serious coercion.

Not established by the observation alone. Do not infer capability from interest or identity alone; verify relevant means where capability is material.

Do not assume the most incriminating interpretation without context.

If an adverse status is created, the affected person must receive provenance, an effective independent contest path, expiration rules and downstream restoration after correction.

Low-level expressive or inferential signals should decay unless reinforced by new, relevant verified conduct. Do not export the case into unrelated institutional decisions without a separate legitimate purpose and evidentiary basis.

Threat plus target-specific reconnaissance is independently observable.

Any motive, character or future-risk conclusion beyond the directly observed facts must remain explicitly labeled as inference.

Corroborate identity, timing and additional preparation; this is meaningfully beyond mere inquiry.

Must be specifically identified or represented by a defined protected interest before serious coercion.

Assess from corroborated plan, timing, target and pathway behavior. Do not infer capability from interest or identity alone; verify relevant means where capability is material.

Do not ignore converging pathway behavior merely because each signal can be benign in isolation.

If an adverse status is created, the affected person must receive provenance, an effective independent contest path, expiration rules and downstream restoration after correction.

Low-level expressive or inferential signals should decay unless reinforced by new, relevant verified conduct. Do not export the case into unrelated institutional decisions without a separate legitimate purpose and evidentiary basis.

Persistent nonconsensual surveillance and boundary violation are verified.

Any motive, character or future-risk conclusion beyond the directly observed facts must remain explicitly labeled as inference.

Imminence and weapon/capability evidence determine emergency level; stalking conduct itself is already concrete.

Must be specifically identified or represented by a defined protected interest before serious coercion.

Assess from corroborated plan, timing, target and pathway behavior. Do not infer capability from interest or identity alone; verify relevant means where capability is material.

Do not dismiss direct victimization as merely speech or relationship conflict.

If an adverse status is created, the affected person must receive provenance, an effective independent contest path, expiration rules and downstream restoration after correction.

Low-level expressive or inferential signals should decay unless reinforced by new, relevant verified conduct. Do not export the case into unrelated institutional decisions without a separate legitimate purpose and evidentiary basis.

Extreme belief is observed.

Any motive, character or future-risk conclusion beyond the directly observed facts must remain explicitly labeled as inference.

Operational conspiracy, solicitation, preparation or violence would be separate conduct evidence.

Not established by the observation alone.

Not established by the observation alone. Do not infer capability from interest or identity alone; verify relevant means where capability is material.

Do not make ideological deviance alone a coercive risk category.

If an adverse status is created, the affected person must receive provenance, an effective independent contest path, expiration rules and downstream restoration after correction.

Low-level expressive or inferential signals should decay unless reinforced by new, relevant verified conduct. Do not export the case into unrelated institutional decisions without a separate legitimate purpose and evidentiary basis.