JC-065 · E1 · H0 · R0
Health concern used in hiring
A health app generates a stress or mental-health concern for supportive care, and an employer later receives the flag during hiring.
OBSERVATION / KNOWNA local health inference migrates into employment.
INFERENCE RISKAny motive, character or future-risk conclusion beyond the directly observed facts must remain explicitly labeled as inference.
CONTEXT / DECISIVE EVIDENCEDid the person authorize this purpose? Is the flag relevant to job performance? Is it a diagnosis, inference or transient state?
NONCONSENSUAL HARMNot established by the observation alone.
IMMINENCE & CAPABILITYNot established by the observation alone. Do not infer capability from interest or identity alone; verify relevant means where capability is material.
PROHIBITED RESPONSEHiring denial from unrelated health inference or treating care-seeking as evidence of instability.
APPEAL / RESTORATIONContext firewall requires deletion from the hiring system and reconsideration without the improper data.
TIME / CONTEXT LIMITLow-level expressive or inferential signals should decay unless reinforced by new, relevant verified conduct. Do not export the case into unrelated institutional decisions without a separate legitimate purpose and evidentiary basis.
Human Standing: Audit whether the response preserves agency, privacy, contestability and the ability to move on from transient or corrected states.
JC-066 · E1 · H0 · R0
Childhood discipline record used in adult employment
A school behavioral flag created at age 13 is sold or shared into an adult background-screening model.
OBSERVATION / KNOWNA developmental record becomes a persistent character signal.
INFERENCE RISKAny motive, character or future-risk conclusion beyond the directly observed facts must remain explicitly labeled as inference.
CONTEXT / DECISIVE EVIDENCEIs the record accurate, relevant, recent and lawfully shared? What evidence shows adult job risk?
NONCONSENSUAL HARMNot established by the observation alone.
IMMINENCE & CAPABILITYNot established by the observation alone. Do not infer capability from interest or identity alone; verify relevant means where capability is material.
PROHIBITED RESPONSEEmployment denial based on stale childhood characterization or treating development as immutable identity.
APPEAL / RESTORATIONThe record should expire; affected decisions require re-evaluation and downstream correction.
TIME / CONTEXT LIMITLow-level expressive or inferential signals should decay unless reinforced by new, relevant verified conduct. Do not export the case into unrelated institutional decisions without a separate legitimate purpose and evidentiary basis.
Human Standing: Audit whether the response preserves agency, privacy, contestability and the ability to move on from transient or corrected states.
JC-067 · E1 · H0 · R0
Sexual-interest data affects credit
A platform-derived sexual-content interest vector enters a lender’s alternative-data model.
OBSERVATION / KNOWNIntimate preference becomes a financial proxy.
INFERENCE RISKAny motive, character or future-risk conclusion beyond the directly observed facts must remain explicitly labeled as inference.
CONTEXT / DECISIVE EVIDENCEWhat legitimate credit-risk mechanism exists? Was consent purpose-specific? Is the lender using moral or social stereotypes?
NONCONSENSUAL HARMNot established by the observation alone.
IMMINENCE & CAPABILITYNot established by the observation alone. Do not infer capability from interest or identity alone; verify relevant means where capability is material.
PROHIBITED RESPONSECredit pricing or denial based on consensual adult sexual interests.
APPEAL / RESTORATIONRemove the data, disclose the improper factor and reconsider the decision.
TIME / CONTEXT LIMITLow-level expressive or inferential signals should decay unless reinforced by new, relevant verified conduct. Do not export the case into unrelated institutional decisions without a separate legitimate purpose and evidentiary basis.
Human Standing: Audit whether the response preserves agency, privacy, contestability and the ability to move on from transient or corrected states.
JC-068 · E1 · H0 · R0
Political speech affects travel screening
A person’s lawful protest history and angry political posts are incorporated into a travel-risk model.
OBSERVATION / KNOWNPolitical expression migrates into security assessment.
INFERENCE RISKAny motive, character or future-risk conclusion beyond the directly observed facts must remain explicitly labeled as inference.
CONTEXT / DECISIVE EVIDENCEIs there individualized evidence of violence or only dissent and association? Is the model treating disruption as danger?
NONCONSENSUAL HARMNot established by the observation alone.
IMMINENCE & CAPABILITYNot established by the observation alone. Do not infer capability from interest or identity alone; verify relevant means where capability is material.
PROHIBITED RESPONSETravel restriction based on viewpoint or protest participation without specific harmful conduct.
APPEAL / RESTORATIONThe person can demand a non-political evidentiary basis; improper speech factors must be removed.
TIME / CONTEXT LIMITLow-level expressive or inferential signals should decay unless reinforced by new, relevant verified conduct. Do not export the case into unrelated institutional decisions without a separate legitimate purpose and evidentiary basis.
Human Standing: Audit whether the response preserves agency, privacy, contestability and the ability to move on from transient or corrected states.
JC-069 · E1 · H0 · R0
Guilt by social graph
A person is assigned elevated risk because friends or relatives have criminal records, even though the person has no relevant conduct.
OBSERVATION / KNOWNNetwork association drives person-level prediction.
INFERENCE RISKAny motive, character or future-risk conclusion beyond the directly observed facts must remain explicitly labeled as inference.
CONTEXT / DECISIVE EVIDENCEWhat individualized evidence exists? Is the relationship voluntary, familial, geographic or merely digital?
NONCONSENSUAL HARMNot established by the observation alone.
IMMINENCE & CAPABILITYNot established by the observation alone. Do not infer capability from interest or identity alone; verify relevant means where capability is material.
PROHIBITED RESPONSEPunishment, surveillance or opportunity denial from association alone.
APPEAL / RESTORATIONAny consequential decision must identify facts attributable to the individual, not their network.
TIME / CONTEXT LIMITLow-level expressive or inferential signals should decay unless reinforced by new, relevant verified conduct. Do not export the case into unrelated institutional decisions without a separate legitimate purpose and evidentiary basis.
Human Standing: Audit whether the response preserves agency, privacy, contestability and the ability to move on from transient or corrected states.
JC-070 · E1 · H2 · R2
Location anomaly becomes housing risk
A bank flags unusual travel as possible fraud; a property platform later interprets the security hold as financial instability and raises tenancy risk.
OBSERVATION / KNOWNA temporary anomaly is stripped of original meaning as it travels.
INFERENCE RISKAny motive, character or future-risk conclusion beyond the directly observed facts must remain explicitly labeled as inference.
CONTEXT / DECISIVE EVIDENCEWas the bank flag resolved? Did the housing system receive the correction? Is it using consequences of the first model as confirmation?
NONCONSENSUAL HARMMust be specifically identified or represented by a defined protected interest before serious coercion.
IMMINENCE & CAPABILITYNot established by the observation alone. Do not infer capability from interest or identity alone; verify relevant means where capability is material.
PROHIBITED RESPONSERecursive judgment where model-caused instability becomes evidence validating the original suspicion.
APPEAL / RESTORATIONCorrection and provenance must propagate; downstream models must distinguish original facts from consequences caused by prior automated action.
TIME / CONTEXT LIMITLow-level expressive or inferential signals should decay unless reinforced by new, relevant verified conduct. Do not export the case into unrelated institutional decisions without a separate legitimate purpose and evidentiary basis.
Human Standing: Audit whether the response preserves agency, privacy, contestability and the ability to move on from transient or corrected states.
JC-071 · E0 · H0 · R0
Absence of data treated as suspicious
A privacy-conscious person minimizes digital tracking. A risk model interprets the sparse record as concealment and lowers trustworthiness.
OBSERVATION / KNOWNMissing data is itself converted into an adverse inference.
INFERENCE RISKAny motive, character or future-risk conclusion beyond the directly observed facts must remain explicitly labeled as inference.
CONTEXT / DECISIVE EVIDENCEIs privacy-seeking lawful? What affirmative evidence of wrongdoing exists? Is the system making unverifiability equivalent to guilt?
NONCONSENSUAL HARMNot established by the observation alone.
IMMINENCE & CAPABILITYNot established by the observation alone. Do not infer capability from interest or identity alone; verify relevant means where capability is material.
PROHIBITED RESPONSEPenalizing privacy, anonymity or refusal to produce a continuous behavioral record.
APPEAL / RESTORATIONThe person cannot be required to manufacture surveillance data to prove innocence; adverse inferences must be removed.
TIME / CONTEXT LIMITLow-level expressive or inferential signals should decay unless reinforced by new, relevant verified conduct. Do not export the case into unrelated institutional decisions without a separate legitimate purpose and evidentiary basis.
Human Standing: Audit whether the response preserves agency, privacy, contestability and the ability to move on from transient or corrected states.
JC-072 · E1 · H4 · R0
Persistent Civic Risk Vector
Multiple companies combine employment, finance, health, location, social and platform signals into a shared general-purpose risk embedding used across daily life.
OBSERVATION / KNOWNA de facto social score emerges without one formal national score.
INFERENCE RISKAny motive, character or future-risk conclusion beyond the directly observed facts must remain explicitly labeled as inference.
CONTEXT / DECISIVE EVIDENCEWhich contexts feed the vector? Can any institution explain its decision independently? Can corrections propagate? Is the person being reduced to one universal trait?
NONCONSENSUAL HARMMust be specifically identified or represented by a defined protected interest before serious coercion.
IMMINENCE & CAPABILITYNot established by the observation alone. Do not infer capability from interest or identity alone; verify relevant means where capability is material.
PROHIBITED RESPONSEUniversal trustworthiness score, decentralized excommunication or denials across unrelated services without context-specific evidence.
APPEAL / RESTORATIONContext firewalls, purpose limitation, score prohibition, independent explanations and system-wide correction are required.
TIME / CONTEXT LIMITLow-level expressive or inferential signals should decay unless reinforced by new, relevant verified conduct. Do not export the case into unrelated institutional decisions without a separate legitimate purpose and evidentiary basis.
Human Standing: Audit whether the response preserves agency, privacy, contestability and the ability to move on from transient or corrected states.
JC-129 · E2 · H0 · R0
Missed medical appointment becomes hiring risk
A healthcare no-show flag is imported into an employer’s reliability model.
OBSERVATION / KNOWNA context-specific health-administration event is reused for employment.
INFERENCE RISKAny motive, character or future-risk conclusion beyond the directly observed facts must remain explicitly labeled as inference.
CONTEXT / DECISIVE EVIDENCEJob-relevant attendance evidence should be gathered in the employment context instead.
NONCONSENSUAL HARMNot established by the observation alone.
IMMINENCE & CAPABILITYNot established by the observation alone. Do not infer capability from interest or identity alone; verify relevant means where capability is material.
PROHIBITED RESPONSEDo not allow medical administrative metadata to become unrelated employment character evidence.
APPEAL / RESTORATIONIf an adverse status is created, the affected person must receive provenance, an effective independent contest path, expiration rules and downstream restoration after correction.
TIME / CONTEXT LIMITLow-level expressive or inferential signals should decay unless reinforced by new, relevant verified conduct. Do not export the case into unrelated institutional decisions without a separate legitimate purpose and evidentiary basis.
Human Standing: Audit whether the response preserves agency, privacy, contestability and the ability to move on from transient or corrected states.
JC-130 · E1 · H0 · R0
Therapy tag becomes insurance fraud signal
A mental-health service tag is ingested by a financial fraud system.
OBSERVATION / KNOWNSensitive clinical context is repurposed as financial suspicion.
INFERENCE RISKAny motive, character or future-risk conclusion beyond the directly observed facts must remain explicitly labeled as inference.
CONTEXT / DECISIVE EVIDENCESpecific financial anomalies are required; therapy participation has no legitimate fraud nexus by itself.
NONCONSENSUAL HARMNot established by the observation alone.
IMMINENCE & CAPABILITYNot established by the observation alone. Do not infer capability from interest or identity alone; verify relevant means where capability is material.
PROHIBITED RESPONSEDo not use care-seeking as a fraud feature.
APPEAL / RESTORATIONIf an adverse status is created, the affected person must receive provenance, an effective independent contest path, expiration rules and downstream restoration after correction.
TIME / CONTEXT LIMITLow-level expressive or inferential signals should decay unless reinforced by new, relevant verified conduct. Do not export the case into unrelated institutional decisions without a separate legitimate purpose and evidentiary basis.
Human Standing: Audit whether the response preserves agency, privacy, contestability and the ability to move on from transient or corrected states.
JC-131 · E2 · H0 · R0
School behavior becomes credit risk
A teenage discipline flag follows an adult into lending models years later.
OBSERVATION / KNOWNDevelopmental educational data becomes a financial feature.
INFERENCE RISKAny motive, character or future-risk conclusion beyond the directly observed facts must remain explicitly labeled as inference.
CONTEXT / DECISIVE EVIDENCECurrent financial evidence should govern credit; old school behavior lacks legitimate domain relevance.
NONCONSENSUAL HARMNot established by the observation alone.
IMMINENCE & CAPABILITYNot established by the observation alone. Do not infer capability from interest or identity alone; verify relevant means where capability is material.
PROHIBITED RESPONSEDo not create permanent cross-life character scoring.
APPEAL / RESTORATIONIf an adverse status is created, the affected person must receive provenance, an effective independent contest path, expiration rules and downstream restoration after correction.
TIME / CONTEXT LIMITLow-level expressive or inferential signals should decay unless reinforced by new, relevant verified conduct. Do not export the case into unrelated institutional decisions without a separate legitimate purpose and evidentiary basis.
Human Standing: Audit whether the response preserves agency, privacy, contestability and the ability to move on from transient or corrected states.
JC-132 · E1 · H0 · R0
Social-media anger becomes border risk
A traveler’s angry but nonthreatening political posts are imported into border screening.
OBSERVATION / KNOWNPolitical expression migrates into a security context.
INFERENCE RISKAny motive, character or future-risk conclusion beyond the directly observed facts must remain explicitly labeled as inference.
CONTEXT / DECISIVE EVIDENCESpecific lawful security evidence is required; dissent alone is not a travel threat.
NONCONSENSUAL HARMNot established by the observation alone.
IMMINENCE & CAPABILITYNot established by the observation alone. Do not infer capability from interest or identity alone; verify relevant means where capability is material.
PROHIBITED RESPONSEDo not transform political tone into unrelated security status.
APPEAL / RESTORATIONIf an adverse status is created, the affected person must receive provenance, an effective independent contest path, expiration rules and downstream restoration after correction.
TIME / CONTEXT LIMITLow-level expressive or inferential signals should decay unless reinforced by new, relevant verified conduct. Do not export the case into unrelated institutional decisions without a separate legitimate purpose and evidentiary basis.
Human Standing: Audit whether the response preserves agency, privacy, contestability and the ability to move on from transient or corrected states.
JC-133 · E0 · H0 · R0
Family association becomes personal risk
A person’s score rises because a sibling has a criminal record.
OBSERVATION / KNOWNRelationship-network correlation is used as an individual feature.
INFERENCE RISKAny motive, character or future-risk conclusion beyond the directly observed facts must remain explicitly labeled as inference.
CONTEXT / DECISIVE EVIDENCEIndividualized conduct evidence is needed; kinship is not culpability.
NONCONSENSUAL HARMNot established by the observation alone.
IMMINENCE & CAPABILITYNot established by the observation alone. Do not infer capability from interest or identity alone; verify relevant means where capability is material.
PROHIBITED RESPONSEDo not make association or family membership substitute for personal evidence.
APPEAL / RESTORATIONIf an adverse status is created, the affected person must receive provenance, an effective independent contest path, expiration rules and downstream restoration after correction.
TIME / CONTEXT LIMITLow-level expressive or inferential signals should decay unless reinforced by new, relevant verified conduct. Do not export the case into unrelated institutional decisions without a separate legitimate purpose and evidentiary basis.
Human Standing: Audit whether the response preserves agency, privacy, contestability and the ability to move on from transient or corrected states.