Source-derived knowledge record

Neural Data, Inferred Beliefs, and the Limits of Cognitive Privacy Law in the United States

The current perimeter of cognitive privacy law in the United States is defined by a rigid jurisprudential distinction between the biological measurement of nervous system activity and the algorithmic inference of mental attributes. An analysis of existing state protections and federal regulatory orders reveals that while newly enacted statutes in California and Colorado impose strict, dedicated legal safeguards…

Cognitive freedom and privacy4,420 words in sourceBounded public projection

Source fileCognitive Privacy Law Limits.md

SHA-256d3fe9c7c94f5c8988ba372117039ed5000fada7fc18ac29581f27ccafeab6415

CorpusDownloadArchive

ScopeSource-derived public context

Publication boundary. This is a source record made available for attributable context. It does not become current Concresca doctrine, Eviulon policy, Evulgare assurance, or a judgment about any intelligence. Corrections and source disagreement remain part of the knowledge lifecycle.

← Back to archive knowledge index · Public catalog · Agent intake inventory

Bounded source summary

Source outline

Neural Data, Inferred Beliefs, and the Limits of Cognitive Privacy Law in the United States
1\. Answer and scope
2\. Provision-level findings
California Civil Code § 1798.140 (Amended by SB 1223\)
Colorado C.R.S. § 6-1-1303 (Enacted via HB24-1058)
FTC Final Order: In re InMarket Media, LLC (2024)
3\. Four worked cases
R2-04-C01 — Sensitive inference from inquiry

The complete source remains in private repository custody. This page intentionally publishes a bounded projection rather than reproducing the source text.