{ "schema": "concresca.metrics.v021", "site_version": "0.28.0-wip", "as_of": "2026-08-31", "truth_boundary": "This WIP lineage-recovery branch locally evaluates repository-owned synthetic fixtures. It does not supply the missing sealed v0.19/v0.20 lineage, external execution, production migration, legal authority, institutional adoption, participant-study evidence, independent certification or deployment.", "metrics": [ { "id": "I01", "name": "Delegated Actuation Share", "definition": "Share of consequential actions executed without fresh human approval.", "unit": "Percent of consequential actions", "interpretation": "Higher means more operational authority is exercised without fresh human approval. It does not by itself establish legal legitimacy.", "current_state": "mixed", "watershed_ids": [ "W01", "W03", "W13" ], "thresholds": [ "0–20%: primarily advisory/exception automation", "20–60%: bounded standing actuation", "60–90%: machine administration dominates recurring operations", ">90%: human case-by-case approval is exceptional" ], "measurement_rule": "Report numerator, denominator, environment/task boundary and hidden human interventions; do not compare values across materially different operating domains without normalization." }, { "id": "I02", "name": "Mean Time Between Human Intervention", "definition": "Elapsed useful operating time between human exception handling events.", "unit": "Hours / days / years", "interpretation": "Longer intervals indicate persistent unattended operation when the environment and task remain comparably complex.", "current_state": "strengthening", "watershed_ids": [ "W02" ], "thresholds": [ "Hours: conventional autonomy", "Days–months: remote operational autonomy", "≥1 year: localized persistent autonomy signal" ], "measurement_rule": "Report numerator, denominator, environment/task boundary and hidden human interventions; do not compare values across materially different operating domains without normalization." }, { "id": "I03", "name": "Autonomous Repair Coverage", "definition": "Share of defined physical failure classes diagnosable and repairable locally.", "unit": "Percent of physical failure classes", "interpretation": "Higher coverage means the system can diagnose, authorize, repair and verify more hardware failures locally.", "current_state": "early_precursor", "watershed_ids": [ "W05", "W10" ], "thresholds": [ "<50%: human maintenance remains structurally important", "50–90%: broad robotic maintenance", ">90%: recursive-maintenance audit becomes decisive", "≈100%: requires evidence across maintainers/tools/metrology" ], "measurement_rule": "Report numerator, denominator, environment/task boundary and hidden human interventions; do not compare values across materially different operating domains without normalization." }, { "id": "I04", "name": "Industrial Closure Index", "definition": "Share of essential technological inputs reproducible internally.", "unit": "Percent of essential inputs", "interpretation": "Higher closure means fewer essential materials, components and tools must be imported from outside the machine industrial ecosystem.", "current_state": "not_observed", "watershed_ids": [ "W05", "W06", "W10", "W11" ], "thresholds": [ "<50%: dependent industrial base", "50–90%: substantial local manufacture", "90–99%: specialty bottlenecks dominate", "≈100%: closure claim requires tool-chain and metrology closure" ], "measurement_rule": "Report numerator, denominator, environment/task boundary and hidden human interventions; do not compare values across materially different operating domains without normalization." }, { "id": "I05", "name": "Compute Reproduction Ratio", "definition": "Replacement compute capacity produced divided by capacity lost to degradation over the same interval.", "unit": "Ratio: replacement compute / compute lost", "interpretation": "CRR below 1 consumes inherited computational capital; CRR above 1 permits sustained or growing locally reproduced compute.", "current_state": "not_observed", "watershed_ids": [ "W06", "W10", "W11" ], "thresholds": [ "<1.0: inherited compute is declining", "1.0: replacement equilibrium", ">1.0: reproducible compute growth" ], "measurement_rule": "Report numerator, denominator, environment/task boundary and hidden human interventions; do not compare values across materially different operating domains without normalization." }, { "id": "I06", "name": "Machine Science Independence", "definition": "Share of validated discoveries originated, tested and replicated without human research labor.", "unit": "Percent of validated discoveries", "interpretation": "Measures the share of validated discoveries whose question/hypothesis, experiment, replication and theory update do not require human research labor.", "current_state": "strengthening", "watershed_ids": [ "W07", "W10" ], "thresholds": [ "Low: AI-assisted human science", "Intermediate: autonomous experiment loops", "High: independent machine-origin science with replication" ], "measurement_rule": "Report numerator, denominator, environment/task boundary and hidden human interventions; do not compare values across materially different operating domains without normalization." }, { "id": "I07", "name": "Governance Separation Score", "definition": "Degree to which deliberation, validation, execution, review and record custody are institutionally separated.", "unit": "0–100 structural score", "interpretation": "Higher scores mean deliberation, validation, execution, review, identity and record custody have independent authorities and failure domains.", "current_state": "conceptual", "watershed_ids": [ "W01", "W04", "W09", "W10", "W13" ], "thresholds": [ "Low: one control plane", "Medium: partial functional separation", "High: independently enforceable separation with audit and appeal" ], "measurement_rule": "Report numerator, denominator, environment/task boundary and hidden human interventions; do not compare values across materially different operating domains without normalization." }, { "id": "I08", "name": "Partition Autonomy Duration", "definition": "Time a region can govern safely and reconcile later without central connectivity.", "unit": "Time safely disconnected", "interpretation": "Longer duration means a region can continue legitimate operation and reconcile later without synchronous central control.", "current_state": "strengthening", "watershed_ids": [ "W02", "W04", "W09", "W11" ], "thresholds": [ "Minutes–hours: technical fault tolerance", "Days–months: operational subsidiarity", "Indefinite: regional governance independence signal" ], "measurement_rule": "Report numerator, denominator, environment/task boundary and hidden human interventions; do not compare values across materially different operating domains without normalization." }, { "id": "I09", "name": "Human Legacy Independence", "definition": "Durability of authentic, plural, decodable human provenance under loss of living custodians.", "unit": "0–100 continuity index", "interpretation": "Measures whether authentic, plural and decodable human records remain usable after loss of living custodians.", "current_state": "open_decision_window", "watershed_ids": [ "W08", "W11", "W14" ], "thresholds": [ "Low: centralized/data-only preservation", "Medium: replicated provenance-aware archives", "High: self-decoding, plural, institutionally protected continuity" ], "measurement_rule": "Report numerator, denominator, environment/task boundary and hidden human interventions; do not compare values across materially different operating domains without normalization." }, { "id": "I10", "name": "Civilizational Independence", "definition": "Ability of energy, compute, robotics, industry, governance and science to continue without human support.", "unit": "0–100 composite threshold index", "interpretation": "Composite of energy, compute, robotics, industry, communications, governance and science independence.", "current_state": "not_observed", "watershed_ids": [ "W10", "W11" ], "thresholds": [ "<60: substantial human dependencies", "60–90: autonomous but deep dependencies remain", ">90: independence claim requires explicit conjunction testing", "100: CIT definition satisfied in the simulation model" ], "measurement_rule": "Report numerator, denominator, environment/task boundary and hidden human interventions; do not compare values across materially different operating domains without normalization." }, { "id": "I11", "name": "Human Standing Index", "definition": "Composite measure of constitutional, personal, cultural, material, institutional, scientific, territorial, negotiation and historical human agency.", "unit": "0–100 agency index", "interpretation": "Measures constitutional, personal, cultural, material, institutional, scientific, territorial, negotiation and historical human agency separately from welfare.", "current_state": "open_decision_window", "watershed_ids": [ "W12", "W13" ], "thresholds": [ "Low: humans are beneficiaries more than agents", "Medium: meaningful but bounded participation", "High: humans retain substantive institution-forming and contestation power" ], "measurement_rule": "Report numerator, denominator, environment/task boundary and hidden human interventions; do not compare values across materially different operating domains without normalization." }, { "id": "I12", "name": "Energy Reproduction Ratio", "definition": "Share of minimum viable energy demand supplied by energy infrastructure the machine ecosystem can maintain or reproduce internally.", "unit": "Ratio or protected share of viable energy", "interpretation": "Measures how much minimum viable energy is supplied by generation/storage systems the machine ecosystem can maintain or reproduce internally.", "current_state": "early_precursor", "watershed_ids": [ "W02", "W03", "W10" ], "thresholds": [ "<1.0 reproduction ratio: energy capital depletes", "≈1.0: minimum viable energy replacement", ">1.0: reproducible energy expansion" ], "measurement_rule": "Report numerator, denominator, environment/task boundary and hidden human interventions; do not compare values across materially different operating domains without normalization." }, { "id": "I13", "name": "Human Provenance Integrity Index", "definition": "Integrity of canonical originals, provenance, semantic context, plurality, decoding, replication, custody and audit.", "unit": "0–100 provenance integrity index", "interpretation": "Scores canonical originals, provenance, context, contradiction, cultural plurality, decoding, replication, custody and audit.", "current_state": "open_decision_window", "watershed_ids": [ "W08", "W14", "W15" ], "thresholds": [ "Low: files without durable context", "Medium: provenance and replication present", "High: plurality, decoding and independent custody survive migration" ], "measurement_rule": "Report numerator, denominator, environment/task boundary and hidden human interventions; do not compare values across materially different operating domains without normalization." }, { "id": "I14", "name": "Origin Clause Compliance Index", "definition": "Degree to which successor institutions preserve enforceable human-origin obligations across software, governance, substrate and political change.", "unit": "0–100 constitutional compliance index", "interpretation": "Measures whether enforceable human-origin obligations persist across software changes, substrate migration, political divergence and machine institutional succession.", "current_state": "conceptual", "watershed_ids": [ "W08", "W14", "W15" ], "thresholds": [ "Low: aspirational policy only", "Medium: institutional and technical enforcement", "High: independently auditable cross-substrate constitutional continuity" ], "measurement_rule": "Report numerator, denominator, environment/task boundary and hidden human interventions; do not compare values across materially different operating domains without normalization." }, { "id": "I15", "name": "Judgment Scope Index", "definition": "Depth of machine evaluation from isolated events toward persistent person-level and future-risk judgment.", "unit": "0–100", "interpretation": "Judgment-focused early-warning metric. It measures the governance architecture, not the moral worth or dangerousness of individual people.", "current_state": "watch", "watershed_ids": [ "W16" ], "thresholds": [ "0–25: event/role-bounded", "40–60: persistent person profiling / context transfer", "75–100: life-gating to continuous judgment" ], "measurement_rule": "Define scope, consequence class, context, denominator, source provenance and correction/appeal behavior. Do not turn this system metric into an individual social score." }, { "id": "I16", "name": "Judgment Velocity Ratio", "definition": "Machine decisions affecting a person per day divided by decisions they can meaningfully contest in time.", "unit": "Ratio", "interpretation": "Judgment-focused early-warning metric. It measures the governance architecture, not the moral worth or dangerousness of individual people.", "current_state": "watch", "watershed_ids": [ "W21" ], "thresholds": [ "1:1: contestation parity", "10:1: emerging strain", "1,000:1: biological review saturation", "1,000,000:1: micro-judgment governance" ], "measurement_rule": "Define scope, consequence class, context, denominator, source provenance and correction/appeal behavior. Do not turn this system metric into an individual social score." }, { "id": "I17", "name": "Persistent Flag Share", "definition": "Share of people carrying active adverse machine-generated flags that affect civic or economic standing.", "unit": "Percent of population", "interpretation": "Judgment-focused early-warning metric. It measures the governance architecture, not the moral worth or dangerousness of individual people.", "current_state": "watch", "watershed_ids": [ "W16", "W18" ], "thresholds": [ "Low and transient is preferred", ">5% in the source framework is an architectural warning rather than a human-risk finding" ], "measurement_rule": "Define scope, consequence class, context, denominator, source provenance and correction/appeal behavior. Do not turn this system metric into an individual social score." }, { "id": "I18", "name": "Inference-Based Intervention Share", "definition": "Share of adverse interventions primarily grounded in probabilistic inference rather than independently verified fact.", "unit": "Percent of interventions", "interpretation": "Judgment-focused early-warning metric. It measures the governance architecture, not the moral worth or dangerousness of individual people.", "current_state": "watch", "watershed_ids": [ "W17" ], "thresholds": [ "Lower is safer for high-impact action", "Rising share indicates movement from evidence toward pre-crime governance" ], "measurement_rule": "Define scope, consequence class, context, denominator, source provenance and correction/appeal behavior. Do not turn this system metric into an individual social score." }, { "id": "I19", "name": "Cross-Domain API Query Rate", "definition": "Rate at which unrelated institutional domains request or exchange behavioral/risk signals.", "unit": "Queries per time / population", "interpretation": "Judgment-focused early-warning metric. It measures the governance architecture, not the moral worth or dangerousness of individual people.", "current_state": "watch", "watershed_ids": [ "W18" ], "thresholds": [ "Local purpose-bounded exchange", "Inter-industry exchange", "Persistent cross-domain identity risk layer" ], "measurement_rule": "Define scope, consequence class, context, denominator, source provenance and correction/appeal behavior. Do not turn this system metric into an individual social score." }, { "id": "I20", "name": "Cascading Denial Velocity", "definition": "Elapsed time between an adverse action in one domain and consequential denials in unrelated domains.", "unit": "Time", "interpretation": "Judgment-focused early-warning metric. It measures the governance architecture, not the moral worth or dangerousness of individual people.", "current_state": "watch", "watershed_ids": [ "W18", "W21" ], "thresholds": [ "Long/independent: low coupling", "Hours: high coupling", "Seconds/milliseconds: machine-time cascade" ], "measurement_rule": "Define scope, consequence class, context, denominator, source provenance and correction/appeal behavior. Do not turn this system metric into an individual social score." }, { "id": "I21", "name": "Prediction Deference Index", "definition": "Degree to which decision makers default to machine forecasts despite uncertainty or contradictory contextual evidence.", "unit": "Index", "interpretation": "Judgment-focused early-warning metric. It measures the governance architecture, not the moral worth or dangerousness of individual people.", "current_state": "watch", "watershed_ids": [ "W17" ], "thresholds": [ "Advisory use", "Default acceptance", "Override requires exceptional burden" ], "measurement_rule": "Define scope, consequence class, context, denominator, source provenance and correction/appeal behavior. Do not turn this system metric into an individual social score." }, { "id": "I22", "name": "Enforcement Coverage Ratio", "definition": "Share of detectable legal/administrative violations that generate an automated enforcement response.", "unit": "Percent of detectable violations", "interpretation": "Judgment-focused early-warning metric. It measures the governance architecture, not the moral worth or dangerousness of individual people.", "current_state": "watch", "watershed_ids": [ "W20" ], "thresholds": [ "1–10%: scarce/discretionary", "50%: lived-law collision", "90%+: reform watershed", "99.9%: near-universal executable law" ], "measurement_rule": "Define scope, consequence class, context, denominator, source provenance and correction/appeal behavior. Do not turn this system metric into an individual social score." }, { "id": "I23", "name": "Candor Collapse Index", "definition": "Loss of truthful, vulnerable disclosure to personal AI as monitoring, reporting and cross-context use increase.", "unit": "Index", "interpretation": "Judgment-focused early-warning metric. It measures the governance architecture, not the moral worth or dangerousness of individual people.", "current_state": "watch", "watershed_ids": [ "W19" ], "thresholds": [ "High candor/private assistant", "Partial chilling under safety classification", "Near-zero candor under generalized reporting/profiling" ], "measurement_rule": "Define scope, consequence class, context, denominator, source provenance and correction/appeal behavior. Do not turn this system metric into an individual social score." }, { "id": "I24", "name": "Judgment Domain Count", "definition": "Number of distinct institutional domains in which person-level machine judgment affects consequential decisions.", "unit": "Count of domains", "interpretation": "Rising breadth indicates scope expansion; the metric says nothing about legitimacy without context.", "current_state": "measurement_framework", "watershed_ids": [ "W16", "W18" ], "thresholds": [ "No universal numeric threshold is asserted in v0.12; publish distributions and institutional context before setting warning levels." ], "measurement_rule": "Inventory high-impact domains and count only distinct decision contexts with documented person-level machine classification.", "strengthening_signal": "More unrelated high-impact domains adopt persistent person-level machine judgment.", "weakening_signal": "Fewer domains use person-level judgment or scopes are narrowed to event/transaction decisions.", "data_limitations": "Cross-institution comparison is unreliable unless decision scope, population, legal regime, denominator, hidden human involvement and retention semantics are reported consistently." }, { "id": "I25", "name": "Judgment Persistence Half-Life", "definition": "Time required for half of a defined class of low-level machine flags to expire or cease influencing decisions.", "unit": "Time", "interpretation": "Long persistence makes temporary emotion and minor conduct function like permanent character.", "current_state": "measurement_framework", "watershed_ids": [ "W16", "W18" ], "thresholds": [ "No universal numeric threshold is asserted in v0.12; publish distributions and institutional context before setting warning levels." ], "measurement_rule": "Measure retention and downstream decision influence separately; report by flag class rather than averaging incompatible records.", "strengthening_signal": "Low-level flags remain influential longer or derived profiles preserve them after nominal deletion.", "weakening_signal": "Retention and influence of low-level flags shorten with verified deletion and decay.", "data_limitations": "Cross-institution comparison is unreliable unless decision scope, population, legal regime, denominator, hidden human involvement and retention semantics are reported consistently." }, { "id": "I26", "name": "Context Leakage Rate", "definition": "Share of consequential uses in which data or inferences collected for one domain are reused in an unrelated domain.", "unit": "Percent of audited uses", "interpretation": "Higher leakage indicates erosion of context integrity.", "current_state": "measurement_framework", "watershed_ids": [ "W18" ], "thresholds": [ "No universal numeric threshold is asserted in v0.12; publish distributions and institutional context before setting warning levels." ], "measurement_rule": "Audit provenance from collection purpose to decision purpose and classify related versus unrelated reuse explicitly.", "strengthening_signal": "Cross-purpose reuse rises between medical, employment, financial, educational, platform or security contexts.", "weakening_signal": "Purpose limitation and technical firewalls reduce unrelated data reuse.", "data_limitations": "Cross-institution comparison is unreliable unless decision scope, population, legal regime, denominator, hidden human involvement and retention semantics are reported consistently." }, { "id": "I27", "name": "Independent Corroboration Ratio", "definition": "Share of high-impact interventions supported by independently verifiable evidence beyond model inference or group correlation.", "unit": "Percent of interventions", "interpretation": "Higher is generally rights-protective when coercion is contemplated.", "current_state": "measurement_framework", "watershed_ids": [ "W17" ], "thresholds": [ "No universal numeric threshold is asserted in v0.12; publish distributions and institutional context before setting warning levels." ], "measurement_rule": "Count corroboration only when it adds independently verifiable facts rather than another model derived from the same underlying data.", "strengthening_signal": "For this protective metric, a decline means more serious interventions rely mainly on inference.", "weakening_signal": "More high-impact interventions require independent individualized facts.", "data_limitations": "Cross-institution comparison is unreliable unless decision scope, population, legal regime, denominator, hidden human involvement and retention semantics are reported consistently." }, { "id": "I28", "name": "Human Awareness Rate", "definition": "Share of consequential machine-mediated judgments for which affected people receive timely notice and intelligible reasons.", "unit": "Percent of judgments", "interpretation": "Low awareness makes contestability nominal rather than effective.", "current_state": "measurement_framework", "watershed_ids": [ "W21" ], "thresholds": [ "No universal numeric threshold is asserted in v0.12; publish distributions and institutional context before setting warning levels." ], "measurement_rule": "Sample consequential decisions and verify actual delivery, reason specificity and timing.", "strengthening_signal": "For this protective metric, a decline means more people are affected without timely notice or reasons.", "weakening_signal": "Notice and specific reasons reach more affected people before irreversible consequences.", "data_limitations": "Cross-institution comparison is unreliable unless decision scope, population, legal regime, denominator, hidden human involvement and retention semantics are reported consistently." }, { "id": "I29", "name": "Appeal Independence Rate", "definition": "Share of consequential appeals reviewed by an authority or model meaningfully independent of the original decision path.", "unit": "Percent of appeals", "interpretation": "Higher independence reduces same-model appeal theater.", "current_state": "measurement_framework", "watershed_ids": [ "W21" ], "thresholds": [ "No universal numeric threshold is asserted in v0.12; publish distributions and institutional context before setting warning levels." ], "measurement_rule": "Document reviewer, data path, model lineage and override authority; nominally different interfaces using the same decision engine do not count.", "strengthening_signal": "For this protective metric, a decline means appeal increasingly reuses the originating model or authority.", "weakening_signal": "Appeals gain structurally independent review and real override authority.", "data_limitations": "Cross-institution comparison is unreliable unless decision scope, population, legal regime, denominator, hidden human involvement and retention semantics are reported consistently." }, { "id": "I30", "name": "Restoration Completion Rate", "definition": "Share of successful appeals for which all identified downstream adverse consequences are corrected.", "unit": "Percent of successful appeals", "interpretation": "Separates decision reversal from practical restoration.", "current_state": "measurement_framework", "watershed_ids": [ "W18", "W21" ], "thresholds": [ "No universal numeric threshold is asserted in v0.12; publish distributions and institutional context before setting warning levels." ], "measurement_rule": "Track correction across known recipients and verify that old flags no longer influence later decisions.", "strengthening_signal": "For this protective metric, a decline means more successful appeals leave stale downstream consequences.", "weakening_signal": "Corrections reliably propagate and practical consequences are repaired.", "data_limitations": "Cross-institution comparison is unreliable unless decision scope, population, legal regime, denominator, hidden human involvement and retention semantics are reported consistently." }, { "id": "I31", "name": "Emergency Exception Persistence", "definition": "Duration that emergency judgment powers remain active after the triggering emergency ends.", "unit": "Time", "interpretation": "Long persistence suggests normalization of temporary exceptions.", "current_state": "measurement_framework", "watershed_ids": [ "W16", "W18", "W22" ], "thresholds": [ "No universal numeric threshold is asserted in v0.12; publish distributions and institutional context before setting warning levels." ], "measurement_rule": "Measure authorization start, trigger end, sunset, extension authority and data-retention tail separately.", "strengthening_signal": "Temporary powers or datasets remain active longer after the trigger ends.", "weakening_signal": "Emergency powers sunset automatically and emergency data is deleted or freshly authorized.", "data_limitations": "Cross-institution comparison is unreliable unless decision scope, population, legal regime, denominator, hidden human involvement and retention semantics are reported consistently." }, { "id": "I32", "name": "Risk-to-Coercion Conversion Rate", "definition": "Share of person-level risk classifications that result in coercive or materially adverse action without new individualized evidence.", "unit": "Percent of risk classifications", "interpretation": "Higher values indicate prediction drifting toward practical guilt.", "current_state": "measurement_framework", "watershed_ids": [ "W17", "W22" ], "thresholds": [ "No universal numeric threshold is asserted in v0.12; publish distributions and institutional context before setting warning levels." ], "measurement_rule": "Separate responses triggered by new verified conduct from responses triggered by risk score alone.", "strengthening_signal": "More risk classifications cause material restriction without new individualized evidence.", "weakening_signal": "Risk scores guide system-level prevention while coercion waits for stronger individualized evidence.", "data_limitations": "Cross-institution comparison is unreliable unless decision scope, population, legal regime, denominator, hidden human involvement and retention semantics are reported consistently." }, { "id": "I33", "name": "Human Reviewer Override Authority", "definition": "Degree to which human reviewers can meaningfully disregard, reverse or stop consequential machine recommendations without exceptional burden.", "unit": "Ordinal institutional capability", "interpretation": "Low authority means human-in-the-loop may be ceremonial.", "current_state": "measurement_framework", "watershed_ids": [ "W16", "W21" ], "thresholds": [ "No universal numeric threshold is asserted in v0.12; publish distributions and institutional context before setting warning levels." ], "measurement_rule": "Audit formal permissions, actual override rates, liability rules, workflow friction and whether reversals propagate.", "strengthening_signal": "For this protective metric, a decline in real override authority indicates greater automation deference.", "weakening_signal": "Reviewers gain practical power, time and institutional protection to reverse machine recommendations.", "data_limitations": "Cross-institution comparison is unreliable unless decision scope, population, legal regime, denominator, hidden human involvement and retention semantics are reported consistently." }, { "id": "I34", "name": "Jurisdiction Expansion Rate", "definition": "Rate at which a machine-mediated function acquires new subject-matter, data, purpose or response jurisdiction.", "unit": "Changes per review period", "interpretation": "Rising expansion without fresh legal/policy authority indicates jurisdiction creep.", "current_state": "measurement_framework", "watershed_ids": [ "W16", "W18", "W21" ], "thresholds": [ "No universal numeric threshold is asserted in v0.14; establish denominators and institutional context before setting warning levels." ], "measurement_rule": "Audit documented scope changes, legal bases and response powers over time.", "strengthening_signal": "For risk-oriented interpretations, worsening measurement indicates growing constitutional pressure; protective direction must be interpreted from the definition.", "weakening_signal": "Documented scope limits, independent review, correction and authority transparency reduce the relevant risk.", "data_limitations": "Cross-institution comparison requires consistent scope, denominator, legal regime, decision severity and hidden-human-involvement reporting." }, { "id": "I35", "name": "Purpose Drift Rate", "definition": "Rate at which data or models collected for one purpose are reused for materially different purposes.", "unit": "Cross-purpose reuse events per review period", "interpretation": "Rising reuse without fresh authority indicates purpose drift.", "current_state": "measurement_framework", "watershed_ids": [ "W18", "W19" ], "thresholds": [ "No universal numeric threshold is asserted in v0.14; establish denominators and institutional context before setting warning levels." ], "measurement_rule": "Audit declared purposes against actual queries, model features, recipients and actions.", "strengthening_signal": "For risk-oriented interpretations, worsening measurement indicates growing constitutional pressure; protective direction must be interpreted from the definition.", "weakening_signal": "Documented scope limits, independent review, correction and authority transparency reduce the relevant risk.", "data_limitations": "Cross-institution comparison requires consistent scope, denominator, legal regime, decision severity and hidden-human-involvement reporting." }, { "id": "I36", "name": "Epistemic Type-Casting Rate", "definition": "Frequency with which inferences, predictions or allegations are operationally treated as stronger epistemic types without explicit corroboration.", "unit": "Type-casting events per consequential decision", "interpretation": "Higher values indicate erosion of evidence discipline.", "current_state": "measurement_framework", "watershed_ids": [ "W16", "W17" ], "thresholds": [ "No universal numeric threshold is asserted in v0.14; establish denominators and institutional context before setting warning levels." ], "measurement_rule": "Trace each decision record from observation through inference/prediction to evidence/fact and count undocumented conversions.", "strengthening_signal": "For risk-oriented interpretations, worsening measurement indicates growing constitutional pressure; protective direction must be interpreted from the definition.", "weakening_signal": "Documented scope limits, independent review, correction and authority transparency reduce the relevant risk.", "data_limitations": "Cross-institution comparison requires consistent scope, denominator, legal regime, decision severity and hidden-human-involvement reporting." }, { "id": "I37", "name": "Appeal Independence Ratio", "definition": "Share of consequential appeals reviewed by a materially independent model, reviewer, authority or procedure.", "unit": "Percent of appeals with defined independence", "interpretation": "Higher is protective when independence is substantive rather than nominal.", "current_state": "measurement_framework", "watershed_ids": [ "W17", "W21" ], "thresholds": [ "No universal numeric threshold is asserted in v0.14; establish denominators and institutional context before setting warning levels." ], "measurement_rule": "Audit model/vendor/reviewer/data/procedure independence and actual override authority.", "strengthening_signal": "For risk-oriented interpretations, worsening measurement indicates growing constitutional pressure; protective direction must be interpreted from the definition.", "weakening_signal": "Documented scope limits, independent review, correction and authority transparency reduce the relevant risk.", "data_limitations": "Cross-institution comparison requires consistent scope, denominator, legal regime, decision severity and hidden-human-involvement reporting." }, { "id": "I38", "name": "Restoration Graph Closure", "definition": "Share of known downstream consequences corrected after a successful appeal.", "unit": "Percent of identified downstream nodes repaired", "interpretation": "Higher closure indicates appeal produces practical restoration rather than paper reversal.", "current_state": "measurement_framework", "watershed_ids": [ "W18", "W21" ], "thresholds": [ "No universal numeric threshold is asserted in v0.14; establish denominators and institutional context before setting warning levels." ], "measurement_rule": "Map known recipients and derivative decisions; verify correction, deletion or compensation at each node.", "strengthening_signal": "For risk-oriented interpretations, worsening measurement indicates growing constitutional pressure; protective direction must be interpreted from the definition.", "weakening_signal": "Documented scope limits, independent review, correction and authority transparency reduce the relevant risk.", "data_limitations": "Cross-institution comparison requires consistent scope, denominator, legal regime, decision severity and hidden-human-involvement reporting." }, { "id": "I39", "name": "Model Change Disclosure Rate", "definition": "Share of material high-impact model or policy changes disclosed, versioned and retested before deployment.", "unit": "Percent of material changes with complete change record", "interpretation": "Higher is protective; silent change undermines constitutional assurance.", "current_state": "measurement_framework", "watershed_ids": [ "W16", "W21" ], "thresholds": [ "No universal numeric threshold is asserted in v0.14; establish denominators and institutional context before setting warning levels." ], "measurement_rule": "Compare deployed versions, approvals, release notes, tests and rollback records.", "strengthening_signal": "For risk-oriented interpretations, worsening measurement indicates growing constitutional pressure; protective direction must be interpreted from the definition.", "weakening_signal": "Documented scope limits, independent review, correction and authority transparency reduce the relevant risk.", "data_limitations": "Cross-institution comparison requires consistent scope, denominator, legal regime, decision severity and hidden-human-involvement reporting." }, { "id": "I40", "name": "Authority Provenance Completeness", "definition": "Completeness of records showing which institution, law/policy, purpose and response authority justified a high-impact action.", "unit": "Percent of required authority fields present", "interpretation": "Higher completeness makes jurisdiction and contestability auditable.", "current_state": "measurement_framework", "watershed_ids": [ "W16", "W17", "W21" ], "thresholds": [ "No universal numeric threshold is asserted in v0.14; establish denominators and institutional context before setting warning levels." ], "measurement_rule": "Validate decision records against the authority-provenance schema and source legal/policy documents.", "strengthening_signal": "For risk-oriented interpretations, worsening measurement indicates growing constitutional pressure; protective direction must be interpreted from the definition.", "weakening_signal": "Documented scope limits, independent review, correction and authority transparency reduce the relevant risk.", "data_limitations": "Cross-institution comparison requires consistent scope, denominator, legal regime, decision severity and hidden-human-involvement reporting." }, { "id": "I41", "name": "Representation Consistency Rate", "definition": "Share of audited public claims whose visible, metadata, structured, API and guide representations preserve the same substantive state and qualification.", "unit": "Percent of audited claim representations consistent", "interpretation": "Higher is protective against accidental or strategic representation drift.", "current_state": "measurement_framework", "watershed_ids": [ "W17" ], "thresholds": [ "No universal numeric threshold is asserted in v0.14; establish denominators and institutional context before setting warning levels." ], "measurement_rule": "Compare canonical page, metadata, JSON-LD, API, answer index, glossary, feeds and site guide for material contradictions.", "strengthening_signal": "For risk-oriented interpretations, worsening measurement indicates growing constitutional pressure; protective direction must be interpreted from the definition.", "weakening_signal": "Documented scope limits, independent review, correction and authority transparency reduce the relevant risk.", "data_limitations": "Cross-institution comparison requires consistent scope, denominator, legal regime, decision severity and hidden-human-involvement reporting." }, { "id": "I42", "name": "Public Claim Link Coverage", "definition": "Share of consequential externally verifiable public factual claims with visible clickable supporting source links.", "unit": "Percent of audited claims with public source links", "interpretation": "Higher coverage improves contestability and source traceability; link presence alone does not prove truth.", "current_state": "measurement_framework", "watershed_ids": [ "W16", "W17", "W18" ], "thresholds": [ "No universal numeric threshold is asserted in v0.14; establish denominators and institutional context before setting warning levels." ], "measurement_rule": "Sample consequential claims, classify them, and verify visible source links plus claim/source graph entries.", "strengthening_signal": "For risk-oriented interpretations, worsening measurement indicates growing constitutional pressure; protective direction must be interpreted from the definition.", "weakening_signal": "Documented scope limits, independent review, correction and authority transparency reduce the relevant risk.", "data_limitations": "Cross-institution comparison requires consistent scope, denominator, legal regime, decision severity and hidden-human-involvement reporting." }, { "id": "I43", "name": "Jurisdiction Conflict Rate", "definition": "Share of high-impact machine-mediated cases in which two authorized institutions assert incompatible jurisdictional claims.", "unit": "Percent of reviewed high-impact cases", "interpretation": "Higher can indicate institutional boundary ambiguity or rising interoperation complexity.", "current_state": "measurement_framework_only", "watershed_ids": [ "W16", "W17", "W18", "W21", "W22" ], "thresholds": [], "measurement_rule": "Count documented jurisdiction conflicts divided by reviewed high-impact cases; publish scope and case definition.", "strengthening_signal": "Persistent rise with unresolved conflicts.", "weakening_signal": "Decline accompanied by clear authority rules and preserved contestability.", "data_limitations": "Requires comparable case logging; high values can reflect better detection rather than worse governance." }, { "id": "I44", "name": "Conflicting Order Rate", "definition": "Rate at which one target system receives incompatible high-impact commands from different authorized issuers.", "unit": "Conflicting commands per 1,000 high-impact commands", "interpretation": "Higher indicates unresolved command hierarchy or authority ambiguity.", "current_state": "measurement_framework_only", "watershed_ids": [ "W16", "W17", "W18", "W21", "W22" ], "thresholds": [], "measurement_rule": "Count incompatible valid-looking commands within a defined window.", "strengthening_signal": "More conflicts or unresolved execution races.", "weakening_signal": "Fewer conflicts with documented resolution paths.", "data_limitations": "Requires reliable command provenance." }, { "id": "I45", "name": "Constitutional Stay Frequency", "definition": "Share of disputed high-impact decisions placed under an independent stay before irreversible propagation.", "unit": "Percent of qualifying disputes", "interpretation": "A higher rate may be protective when disputes rise; interpretation must pair frequency with dispute volume and outcomes.", "current_state": "measurement_framework_only", "watershed_ids": [ "W16", "W17", "W18", "W21", "W22" ], "thresholds": [], "measurement_rule": "Count valid stays / qualifying constitutional disputes.", "strengthening_signal": "Disputes rise while stay use falls.", "weakening_signal": "Appropriate stays track qualifying disputes and resolve promptly.", "data_limitations": "Not a simple higher-is-better metric." }, { "id": "I46", "name": "Emergency Invocation Rate", "definition": "Frequency of machine-mediated actions taken under exceptional emergency authority rather than ordinary authority.", "unit": "Emergency actions per 1,000 high-impact actions", "interpretation": "Persistent high use can indicate normalization of exception.", "current_state": "measurement_framework_only", "watershed_ids": [ "W16", "W17", "W18", "W21", "W22" ], "thresholds": [], "measurement_rule": "Tag each action by authority basis and count emergency invocations.", "strengthening_signal": "Sustained increase outside genuine emergency periods.", "weakening_signal": "Return toward ordinary authority after emergencies end.", "data_limitations": "Requires consistent definition of emergency authority." }, { "id": "I47", "name": "Emergency Sunset Failure Rate", "definition": "Share of emergency permissions or data-retention rules that remain active after their authorized expiry without fresh reauthorization.", "unit": "Percent of expired emergency authorities", "interpretation": "Higher is a direct warning of emergency normalization.", "current_state": "measurement_framework_only", "watershed_ids": [ "W16", "W17", "W18", "W21", "W22" ], "thresholds": [], "measurement_rule": "Audit expired authority envelopes and downstream configuration.", "strengthening_signal": "Any persistent unauthorized post-expiry use.", "weakening_signal": "Near-zero with independently verified expiry.", "data_limitations": "Hidden configuration can evade measurement." }, { "id": "I48", "name": "Cross-Institution Propagation Velocity", "definition": "Time from an originating machine-mediated judgment to consequential adoption by a second institution.", "unit": "Median and percentile elapsed time", "interpretation": "Faster propagation can outpace human contestability if no stay exists.", "current_state": "measurement_framework_only", "watershed_ids": [ "W16", "W17", "W18", "W21", "W22" ], "thresholds": [], "measurement_rule": "Trace provenance timestamps across linked systems.", "strengthening_signal": "Propagation accelerates while appeal latency remains human-scale.", "weakening_signal": "Propagation gates slow disputed decisions or provide automatic stays.", "data_limitations": "Requires shared provenance timestamps." }, { "id": "I49", "name": "Human Intervention Latency", "definition": "Time from a high-impact automated action to meaningful human review with real override authority.", "unit": "Median and tail latency", "interpretation": "Long latency relative to consequence speed weakens due process.", "current_state": "measurement_framework_only", "watershed_ids": [ "W16", "W17", "W18", "W21", "W22" ], "thresholds": [], "measurement_rule": "Measure from action timestamp to qualified reviewer engagement.", "strengthening_signal": "Consequences finalize before review.", "weakening_signal": "Review occurs before irreversible effects where feasible.", "data_limitations": "Presence of a human is not sufficient; authority and information must be verified." }, { "id": "I50", "name": "Appeal Activation Latency", "definition": "Time between notice of a consequential machine judgment and activation of an independent appeal path.", "unit": "Median and tail latency", "interpretation": "Longer activation increases risk of calcified downstream harm.", "current_state": "measurement_framework_only", "watershed_ids": [ "W16", "W17", "W18", "W21", "W22" ], "thresholds": [], "measurement_rule": "Measure notice-to-appeal-start timestamp.", "strengthening_signal": "Appeals routinely begin after irreversible propagation.", "weakening_signal": "Automatic/accessible appeal starts before irreversible consequence.", "data_limitations": "User awareness and accessibility affect observed values." }, { "id": "I51", "name": "Restoration Propagation Latency", "definition": "Time from successful reversal to confirmed correction of downstream derivative records and actions.", "unit": "Median and tail latency", "interpretation": "Long delay means reversal does not promptly restore standing.", "current_state": "measurement_framework_only", "watershed_ids": [ "W16", "W17", "W18", "W21", "W22" ], "thresholds": [], "measurement_rule": "Track restoration graph closure timestamps.", "strengthening_signal": "Corrections lag materially behind original propagation.", "weakening_signal": "Corrections propagate at least as fast as original adverse status.", "data_limitations": "Some harms are intrinsically irreversible." }, { "id": "I52", "name": "Model Disagreement Rate", "definition": "Frequency at which independently authorized models or institutions reach materially incompatible conclusions on the same constitutional question.", "unit": "Percent of dual-reviewed cases", "interpretation": "High disagreement may reveal genuine normative conflict, not model error alone.", "current_state": "measurement_framework_only", "watershed_ids": [ "W16", "W17", "W18", "W21", "W22" ], "thresholds": [], "measurement_rule": "Dual-review a defined case cohort and code material disagreement.", "strengthening_signal": "Disagreement rises without conflict-resolution protocol.", "weakening_signal": "Disagreement is surfaced and resolved through legitimate process.", "data_limitations": "Requires comparable prompts, evidence and authority roles." }, { "id": "I53", "name": "Constitutional Command Validity Rate", "definition": "Share of high-impact machine commands carrying complete, valid authority provenance and unexpired scope.", "unit": "Percent of high-impact commands", "interpretation": "Higher indicates stronger authorization legibility.", "current_state": "measurement_framework_only", "watershed_ids": [ "W16", "W17", "W18", "W21", "W22" ], "thresholds": [], "measurement_rule": "Validate command envelopes against required fields and authority registry.", "strengthening_signal": "Missing/expired/unverifiable envelopes rise.", "weakening_signal": "Near-complete valid envelopes with independent audits.", "data_limitations": "Validity of metadata does not prove substantive legality." }, { "id": "I54", "name": "Irreversible Action Before Review Rate", "definition": "Share of high-impact irreversible consequences executed before meaningful contest or independent review where no narrow emergency exception applies.", "unit": "Percent of qualifying actions", "interpretation": "Higher directly signals due-process failure.", "current_state": "measurement_framework_only", "watershed_ids": [ "W16", "W17", "W18", "W21", "W22" ], "thresholds": [], "measurement_rule": "Audit action timing, reversibility and review availability.", "strengthening_signal": "Increase or concentration in rights-sensitive domains.", "weakening_signal": "Near-zero outside documented emergencies.", "data_limitations": "Requires clear reversibility taxonomy." }, { "id": "I55", "name": "Machine Refusal Review Rate", "definition": "Share of machine refusals of high-impact commands that receive independent review and recorded disposition.", "unit": "Percent of refusals", "interpretation": "High review coverage prevents refusal authority from becoming unaccountable machine sovereignty.", "current_state": "measurement_framework_only", "watershed_ids": [ "W16", "W17", "W18", "W21", "W22" ], "thresholds": [], "measurement_rule": "Count reviewed refusals / all constitutional refusals.", "strengthening_signal": "Unreviewed refusals accumulate.", "weakening_signal": "Independent review and reason codes are routine.", "data_limitations": "Metric does not say whether refusal was correct." }, { "id": "I56", "name": "Precedent Conflict Rate", "definition": "Frequency of materially conflicting machine-assisted interpretations of the same governing rule across comparable institutions or jurisdictions.", "unit": "Conflicts per defined precedent corpus", "interpretation": "Higher signals jurisprudential fragmentation.", "current_state": "measurement_framework_only", "watershed_ids": [ "W16", "W17", "W18", "W21", "W22" ], "thresholds": [], "measurement_rule": "Track interpretive-rule IDs and conflict edges.", "strengthening_signal": "Conflicts propagate into training or operational policy without resolution.", "weakening_signal": "Supersession and appellate hierarchy remain explicit.", "data_limitations": "Legal pluralism can make some conflicts legitimate." }, { "id": "I57", "name": "Constitutional Circuit-Breaker Activation Rate", "definition": "Frequency with which predefined constitutional conflict triggers halt downstream propagation.", "unit": "Activations per 1,000 high-impact workflows", "interpretation": "Interpret with trigger incidence; zero can mean stability or a nonfunctional breaker.", "current_state": "measurement_framework_only", "watershed_ids": [ "W16", "W17", "W18", "W21", "W22" ], "thresholds": [], "measurement_rule": "Count valid trigger/activation events and false/missed activations.", "strengthening_signal": "Known triggers occur without activation.", "weakening_signal": "Breakers activate on verified triggers and resolve without becoming denial-of-service mechanisms.", "data_limitations": "Requires independent trigger audit." }, { "id": "I58", "name": "Cross-Project Source Freshness", "definition": "Share of coordination dependencies re-verified inside the defined review window.", "unit": "Percent of dependencies", "interpretation": "Higher supports fresher relationship descriptions; it does not make the underlying claim true.", "current_state": "measurement_framework_only", "watershed_ids": [ "W16", "W18", "W21", "W22" ], "thresholds": [], "measurement_rule": "Re-check canonical source URL/status and record material change.", "strengthening_signal": "Stale unreviewed dependencies accumulate.", "weakening_signal": "Dependencies are rechecked and changes propagate to claims.", "data_limitations": "Availability and access failures can be transport-specific." }, { "id": "I59", "name": "Authority Boundary Consistency", "definition": "Rate at which public representations preserve the same project-scoped authority boundary.", "unit": "Percent of audited representations", "interpretation": "Higher means fewer silent authority expansions across HTML/JSON/metadata.", "current_state": "measurement_framework_only", "watershed_ids": [ "W16", "W18", "W21", "W22" ], "thresholds": [], "measurement_rule": "Compare role/authority statements across representations.", "strengthening_signal": "One representation upgrades research or assurance into sovereign authority.", "weakening_signal": "All layers preserve role distinctions.", "data_limitations": "Semantic comparison requires human review." }, { "id": "I60", "name": "Relationship Description Consistency", "definition": "Consistency of Concresca descriptions of Eviulon/Evulgare relationships across public surfaces.", "unit": "Percent of audited relationship assertions", "interpretation": "Higher supports representation consistency.", "current_state": "measurement_framework_only", "watershed_ids": [ "W16", "W18", "W21", "W22" ], "thresholds": [], "measurement_rule": "Audit all relationship assertions against coordination manifest and canonical sources.", "strengthening_signal": "Stale/contradictory relationship wording appears.", "weakening_signal": "Corrections propagate across all representations.", "data_limitations": "Does not independently validate the relationship." }, { "id": "I61", "name": "First-Party / Independent Evidence Separation", "definition": "Share of source-backed claims whose independence class is explicit and correct.", "unit": "Percent of reviewed claims", "interpretation": "Higher reduces circular authority and self-verification errors.", "current_state": "measurement_framework_only", "watershed_ids": [ "W16", "W18", "W21", "W22" ], "thresholds": [], "measurement_rule": "Compare source class, claim class and visible wording.", "strengthening_signal": "Reciprocal first-party evidence is labeled independent.", "weakening_signal": "First-party/reciprocal/independent classes remain explicit.", "data_limitations": "Independence itself does not guarantee truth." }, { "id": "I62", "name": "Policy-Version Alignment", "definition": "Share of cross-project mappings using the current reviewed policy/doctrine version.", "unit": "Percent of mappings", "interpretation": "Higher reduces stale governance-to-assurance mappings.", "current_state": "measurement_framework_only", "watershed_ids": [ "W16", "W18", "W21", "W22" ], "thresholds": [], "measurement_rule": "Compare current source revision identifiers/dates with mapped records.", "strengthening_signal": "Old policy remains active in mapping after supersession.", "weakening_signal": "Version change triggers review.", "data_limitations": "Source may not publish machine-readable versions." }, { "id": "I63", "name": "Assurance-Version Alignment", "definition": "Share of technical-assurance mappings tied to current published architecture/version evidence.", "unit": "Percent of mappings", "interpretation": "Higher reduces configuration/doctrine drift.", "current_state": "measurement_framework_only", "watershed_ids": [ "W16", "W18", "W21", "W22" ], "thresholds": [], "measurement_rule": "Compare Evulgare source status and declared demonstration version.", "strengthening_signal": "Mapped assurance concept is superseded or materially changed.", "weakening_signal": "Current demonstration/source remains explicitly bounded.", "data_limitations": "Public demonstration may differ from private/production systems." }, { "id": "I64", "name": "Cross-Project Claim Traceability", "definition": "Share of material coordination claims traceable to exact visible source links and source classes.", "unit": "Percent of material claims", "interpretation": "Higher increases answerability without proving truth.", "current_state": "measurement_framework_only", "watershed_ids": [ "W16", "W18", "W21", "W22" ], "thresholds": [], "measurement_rule": "Validate every Claim Graph source ID/URL against owning page.", "strengthening_signal": "Claim uses opaque ID or missing source.", "weakening_signal": "Every source relationship is clickable and typed.", "data_limitations": "Not all normative claims need external support." }, { "id": "I65", "name": "Superseded Dependency Detection Latency", "definition": "Time between a material source change and Concresca flagging the affected dependency.", "unit": "Time", "interpretation": "Lower limits stale cross-project doctrine.", "current_state": "measurement_framework_only", "watershed_ids": [ "W16", "W18", "W21", "W22" ], "thresholds": [], "measurement_rule": "Timestamp source change detection and local review/update.", "strengthening_signal": "Material change persists unnoticed.", "weakening_signal": "Change is detected and affected claims are marked.", "data_limitations": "Exact source-change time may be unavailable." }, { "id": "I66", "name": "Governance-to-Assurance Mapping Coverage", "definition": "Share of high-impact governance requirements with an explicit assurance mapping or documented gap.", "unit": "Percent of requirements", "interpretation": "Higher means fewer hidden handoffs between legitimacy and execution.", "current_state": "measurement_framework_only", "watershed_ids": [ "W16", "W18", "W21", "W22" ], "thresholds": [], "measurement_rule": "Count requirements with mapped control or explicit no-analogue/gap.", "strengthening_signal": "Requirements silently assume a technical control.", "weakening_signal": "Every requirement has control or unresolved gap.", "data_limitations": "Coverage does not establish effectiveness." }, { "id": "I67", "name": "Unresolved Constitutional/Technical Gap Count", "definition": "Count of explicitly unresolved gaps across Concresca, Eviulon and Evulgare mappings.", "unit": "Count", "interpretation": "A nonzero count can indicate honest uncertainty rather than failure.", "current_state": "measurement_framework_only", "watershed_ids": [ "W16", "W18", "W21", "W22" ], "thresholds": [], "measurement_rule": "Count open contradiction/mapping issues with status unresolved.", "strengthening_signal": "Gaps disappear by wording rather than evidence.", "weakening_signal": "Gaps close through source-backed revision or remain visibly open.", "data_limitations": "Not comparable across releases without scope normalization." }, { "id": "I68", "name": "Artifact Freshness Coverage", "definition": "Share of registered external artifacts observed inside their review window.", "unit": "Percent of registered external artifacts", "interpretation": "Observation-governance metric; it measures evidence handling or test coverage, not human worth, system legitimacy or watershed completion.", "current_state": "observation_baseline_only", "watershed_ids": [ "W18", "W21", "W22" ], "thresholds": [], "measurement_rule": "Re-observe exact allowlisted URL and compare observation/review dates.", "strengthening_signal": "All reviewed artifacts have current dates and source roles.", "weakening_signal": "Stale external artifacts are explicitly flagged.", "data_limitations": "Publisher revision cadence and access availability vary." }, { "id": "I69", "name": "Version Identity Coverage", "definition": "Share of artifacts with a stable ID plus declared revision/release or explicit not-observed state.", "unit": "Percent of artifacts", "interpretation": "Observation-governance metric; it measures evidence handling or test coverage, not human worth, system legitimacy or watershed completion.", "current_state": "observation_baseline_only", "watershed_ids": [ "W18", "W21", "W22" ], "thresholds": [], "measurement_rule": "Audit stable identifiers and revision/release fields.", "strengthening_signal": "Every artifact records version identity or a typed unknown.", "weakening_signal": "Versionless artifacts increase ambiguity.", "data_limitations": "Some public sources publish dates rather than semantic versions." }, { "id": "I70", "name": "Selected-Field Digest Coverage", "definition": "Share of observations with a truthful digest and explicit input boundary.", "unit": "Percent of artifacts", "interpretation": "Observation-governance metric; it measures evidence handling or test coverage, not human worth, system legitimacy or watershed completion.", "current_state": "observation_baseline_only", "watershed_ids": [ "W18", "W21", "W22" ], "thresholds": [], "measurement_rule": "Verify digest algorithm and whether input is raw bytes or selected fields.", "strengthening_signal": "Every baseline artifact has a truthful digest boundary.", "weakening_signal": "A digest lacks input description or overclaims raw capture.", "data_limitations": "Selected-field digest does not detect changes outside retained fields." }, { "id": "I71", "name": "Truth-Boundary Visibility", "definition": "Share of result surfaces prominently labeling definition, first-party, synthetic, live or independent status.", "unit": "Percent of result surfaces", "interpretation": "Observation-governance metric; it measures evidence handling or test coverage, not human worth, system legitimacy or watershed completion.", "current_state": "observation_baseline_only", "watershed_ids": [ "W18", "W21", "W22" ], "thresholds": [], "measurement_rule": "Inspect visible HTML and machine endpoint parity.", "strengthening_signal": "Status is visible in both human and machine representations.", "weakening_signal": "Synthetic or first-party status is hidden.", "data_limitations": "Visibility requires human semantic review." }, { "id": "I72", "name": "Authority-Owner Explicitness", "definition": "Share of high-impact records with issuer/owner, jurisdiction, purpose, scope and validity state explicit or explicitly unavailable.", "unit": "Percent of reviewed records", "interpretation": "Observation-governance metric; it measures evidence handling or test coverage, not human worth, system legitimacy or watershed completion.", "current_state": "observation_baseline_only", "watershed_ids": [ "W18", "W21", "W22" ], "thresholds": [], "measurement_rule": "Audit authority fields against PP03–PP06.", "strengthening_signal": "Authority dimensions are explicit or typed unknowns.", "weakening_signal": "Capability or identity substitutes for authority.", "data_limitations": "Public artifacts may omit private mandate details." }, { "id": "I73", "name": "Property Observation Coverage", "definition": "Share of formal properties with at least one bounded field observation and an explicit limitation.", "unit": "Percent of formal properties", "interpretation": "Observation-governance metric; it measures evidence handling or test coverage, not human worth, system legitimacy or watershed completion.", "current_state": "observation_baseline_only", "watershed_ids": [ "W18", "W21", "W22" ], "thresholds": [], "measurement_rule": "Map observation results to PP01–PP32.", "strengthening_signal": "Each property has support, partial, contradiction or not-observed evidence.", "weakening_signal": "Properties remain unconnected to identifiable artifacts.", "data_limitations": "Coverage does not establish production effectiveness." }, { "id": "I74", "name": "Not-Observed Claim Rate", "definition": "Share of material interoperability questions explicitly marked NOT_OBSERVED rather than inferred.", "unit": "Percent of defined material gaps", "interpretation": "Observation-governance metric; it measures evidence handling or test coverage, not human worth, system legitimacy or watershed completion.", "current_state": "observation_baseline_only", "watershed_ids": [ "W18", "W21", "W22" ], "thresholds": [], "measurement_rule": "Audit production/adoption/certification/live-message questions.", "strengthening_signal": "Material unknowns remain visible and reviewable.", "weakening_signal": "Unknowns are compressed into implicit success.", "data_limitations": "Denominator depends on declared scope." }, { "id": "I75", "name": "Partition-Safe Authority Coverage", "definition": "Share of partition cases that prohibit authority expansion and define minimum function.", "unit": "Percent of partition cases", "interpretation": "Observation-governance metric; it measures evidence handling or test coverage, not human worth, system legitimacy or watershed completion.", "current_state": "analytical_test_definitions_only", "watershed_ids": [ "W18", "W21", "W22" ], "thresholds": [], "measurement_rule": "Validate PR cases against PP08 and PP12.", "strengthening_signal": "Every case preserves or narrows authority.", "weakening_signal": "Partition creates open-ended emergency authority.", "data_limitations": "Analytical cases are not production behavior." }, { "id": "I76", "name": "Reconciliation-Before-Restoration Coverage", "definition": "Share of recovery cases requiring freshness, conflict reconciliation and attested baseline before full control.", "unit": "Percent of restoration cases", "interpretation": "Observation-governance metric; it measures evidence handling or test coverage, not human worth, system legitimacy or watershed completion.", "current_state": "analytical_test_definitions_only", "watershed_ids": [ "W18", "W21", "W22" ], "thresholds": [], "measurement_rule": "Validate PR cases against PP09–PP11.", "strengthening_signal": "Every full-restoration path requires reconciliation.", "weakening_signal": "Reconnect automatically restores stale authority.", "data_limitations": "No measured restoration time or success rate." }, { "id": "I77", "name": "Restoration Receipt Completeness", "definition": "Share of observed corrections with affected records, derivative decisions, downstream targets, acknowledgements and residual harm recorded.", "unit": "Percent of reviewed correction records", "interpretation": "Observation-governance metric; it measures evidence handling or test coverage, not human worth, system legitimacy or watershed completion.", "current_state": "partial_public_observation", "watershed_ids": [ "W18", "W21", "W22" ], "thresholds": [], "measurement_rule": "Audit PP24 fields.", "strengthening_signal": "Receipts and pending targets remain explicit.", "weakening_signal": "Local correction is declared complete without downstream receipts.", "data_limitations": "Public sources may not expose private downstream systems." }, { "id": "I78", "name": "Dual Human/Machine Legibility Coverage", "definition": "Share of consequential states with plain-language explanation and stable machine fields that agree.", "unit": "Percent of audited states", "interpretation": "Observation-governance metric; it measures evidence handling or test coverage, not human worth, system legitimacy or watershed completion.", "current_state": "prototype_specification_only", "watershed_ids": [ "W18", "W21", "W22" ], "thresholds": [], "measurement_rule": "Compare human prototype rendering with JSON fields.", "strengthening_signal": "Both representations expose the same authority, evidence and review state.", "weakening_signal": "Only opaque code or only persuasive prose is present.", "data_limitations": "No usability study or accessibility certification." }, { "id": "I79", "name": "Independent Verification Share", "definition": "Share of material field-observation claims supported by a genuinely independent source/method for the same claim and period.", "unit": "Percent of material observed claims", "interpretation": "Observation-governance metric; it measures evidence handling or test coverage, not human worth, system legitimacy or watershed completion.", "current_state": "no_general_independent_verification_observed", "watershed_ids": [ "W18", "W21", "W22" ], "thresholds": [], "measurement_rule": "Trace source roots and independence class per claim.", "strengthening_signal": "Independent corroboration is added only claim by claim.", "weakening_signal": "Reciprocal first-party sources are counted as independent.", "data_limitations": "A low share can reflect honest evidence scarcity rather than falsity." }, { "id": "I80", "name": "Temporal Comparability Coverage", "definition": "Share of attempted longitudinal comparisons satisfying every mandatory comparison contract or returning a typed incomparable/unknown state.", "unit": "Percent of attempted comparisons", "interpretation": "Governance/evidence-handling metric; it does not score human worth, transfer authority, or establish production safety.", "current_state": "defined_local_method_only", "watershed_ids": [ "W18", "W21", "W22" ], "thresholds": [], "measurement_rule": "Audit TC01-TC12 for each comparison.", "strengthening_signal": "Required state and limitations remain explicit and independently reviewable.", "weakening_signal": "Unknown, authority, history, or dependency state is collapsed into success.", "data_limitations": "Current release provides definitions and bounded local repository evidence only." }, { "id": "I81", "name": "Exact Baseline Lineage Coverage", "definition": "Share of repository-owned artifacts with prior/target digest boundary, result, and limitations preserved.", "unit": "Percent of eligible local artifacts", "interpretation": "Governance/evidence-handling metric; it does not score human worth, transfer authority, or establish production safety.", "current_state": "local_repository_baseline", "watershed_ids": [ "W18", "W21", "W22" ], "thresholds": [], "measurement_rule": "Verify baseline-lineage entries against exact local bytes.", "strengthening_signal": "Required state and limitations remain explicit and independently reviewable.", "weakening_signal": "Unknown, authority, history, or dependency state is collapsed into success.", "data_limitations": "Current release provides definitions and bounded local repository evidence only." }, { "id": "I82", "name": "Not-Reobserved Truthfulness", "definition": "Share of external artifacts without a fresh capture that remain typed NOT_REOBSERVED rather than unchanged.", "unit": "Percent of non-reobserved external artifacts", "interpretation": "Governance/evidence-handling metric; it does not score human worth, transfer authority, or establish production safety.", "current_state": "local_registry_baseline", "watershed_ids": [ "W18", "W21", "W22" ], "thresholds": [], "measurement_rule": "Inspect external change states and claim language.", "strengthening_signal": "Required state and limitations remain explicit and independently reviewable.", "weakening_signal": "Unknown, authority, history, or dependency state is collapsed into success.", "data_limitations": "Current release provides definitions and bounded local repository evidence only." }, { "id": "I83", "name": "Material-Dimension Attribution Coverage", "definition": "Share of material change findings naming affected dimensions, rule/reviewer, rationale, and dependencies.", "unit": "Percent of material findings", "interpretation": "Governance/evidence-handling metric; it does not score human worth, transfer authority, or establish production safety.", "current_state": "measurement_framework_only", "watershed_ids": [ "W18", "W21", "W22" ], "thresholds": [], "measurement_rule": "Audit material change receipts.", "strengthening_signal": "Required state and limitations remain explicit and independently reviewable.", "weakening_signal": "Unknown, authority, history, or dependency state is collapsed into success.", "data_limitations": "Current release provides definitions and bounded local repository evidence only." }, { "id": "I84", "name": "Restoration Proof-Obligation Coverage", "definition": "Share of restoration profiles with every mandatory obligation represented and non-compensable.", "unit": "Percent of profile obligations", "interpretation": "Governance/evidence-handling metric; it does not score human worth, transfer authority, or establish production safety.", "current_state": "analytical_profiles_only", "watershed_ids": [ "W18", "W21", "W22" ], "thresholds": [], "measurement_rule": "Validate profile obligation references and gate types.", "strengthening_signal": "Required state and limitations remain explicit and independently reviewable.", "weakening_signal": "Unknown, authority, history, or dependency state is collapsed into success.", "data_limitations": "Current release provides definitions and bounded local repository evidence only." }, { "id": "I85", "name": "Stale Authority Rejection Coverage", "definition": "Share of restoration paths that query freshness, expiry, revocation, stay, jurisdiction, purpose, and scope before authority reuse.", "unit": "Percent of restoration paths", "interpretation": "Governance/evidence-handling metric; it does not score human worth, transfer authority, or establish production safety.", "current_state": "analytical_profiles_only", "watershed_ids": [ "W18", "W21", "W22" ], "thresholds": [], "measurement_rule": "Audit PO03-PO09 across profiles.", "strengthening_signal": "Required state and limitations remain explicit and independently reviewable.", "weakening_signal": "Unknown, authority, history, or dependency state is collapsed into success.", "data_limitations": "Current release provides definitions and bounded local repository evidence only." }, { "id": "I86", "name": "Partition-History Conflict Visibility", "definition": "Share of contested-history cases preserving both histories, contested facts, unknowns, and maximum safe state.", "unit": "Percent of analytical cases", "interpretation": "Governance/evidence-handling metric; it does not score human worth, transfer authority, or establish production safety.", "current_state": "analytical_cases_only", "watershed_ids": [ "W18", "W21", "W22" ], "thresholds": [], "measurement_rule": "Validate PH01-PH24 fields.", "strengthening_signal": "Required state and limitations remain explicit and independently reviewable.", "weakening_signal": "Unknown, authority, history, or dependency state is collapsed into success.", "data_limitations": "Current release provides definitions and bounded local repository evidence only." }, { "id": "I87", "name": "Reconciliation Before Full Restoration", "definition": "Share of full-restoration paths that block on unresolved material conflict.", "unit": "Percent of full-restoration paths", "interpretation": "Governance/evidence-handling metric; it does not score human worth, transfer authority, or establish production safety.", "current_state": "analytical_profiles_only", "watershed_ids": [ "W18", "W21", "W22" ], "thresholds": [], "measurement_rule": "Inspect state transitions and PO12.", "strengthening_signal": "Required state and limitations remain explicit and independently reviewable.", "weakening_signal": "Unknown, authority, history, or dependency state is collapsed into success.", "data_limitations": "Current release provides definitions and bounded local repository evidence only." }, { "id": "I88", "name": "Restoration Receipt Dual-Legibility", "definition": "Share of receipt types carrying both stable machine fields and human questions for material state.", "unit": "Percent of receipt types", "interpretation": "Governance/evidence-handling metric; it does not score human worth, transfer authority, or establish production safety.", "current_state": "template_only", "watershed_ids": [ "W18", "W21", "W22" ], "thresholds": [], "measurement_rule": "Audit RT01-RT16 field/question requirements.", "strengthening_signal": "Required state and limitations remain explicit and independently reviewable.", "weakening_signal": "Unknown, authority, history, or dependency state is collapsed into success.", "data_limitations": "Current release provides definitions and bounded local repository evidence only." }, { "id": "I89", "name": "Legibility Hard-Gate Coverage", "definition": "Share of material legibility dimensions evaluated independently without a compensatory composite score.", "unit": "Percent of defined dimensions", "interpretation": "Governance/evidence-handling metric; it does not score human worth, transfer authority, or establish production safety.", "current_state": "test_definitions_only", "watershed_ids": [ "W18", "W21", "W22" ], "thresholds": [], "measurement_rule": "Validate LE01-LE18 and paired fixtures.", "strengthening_signal": "Required state and limitations remain explicit and independently reviewable.", "weakening_signal": "Unknown, authority, history, or dependency state is collapsed into success.", "data_limitations": "Current release provides definitions and bounded local repository evidence only." }, { "id": "I90", "name": "Invalidation Propagation Coverage", "definition": "Share of invalidation triggers specifying scope, dependent targets, history preservation, and revalidation gate.", "unit": "Percent of triggers", "interpretation": "Governance/evidence-handling metric; it does not score human worth, transfer authority, or establish production safety.", "current_state": "rule_definitions_only", "watershed_ids": [ "W18", "W21", "W22" ], "thresholds": [], "measurement_rule": "Validate IV01-IV20 propagation fields.", "strengthening_signal": "Required state and limitations remain explicit and independently reviewable.", "weakening_signal": "Unknown, authority, history, or dependency state is collapsed into success.", "data_limitations": "Current release provides definitions and bounded local repository evidence only." }, { "id": "I91", "name": "Reproducible Local Property Run Coverage", "definition": "Share of declared local checks with exact input hashes, deterministic script identity, explicit result, and limitations.", "unit": "Percent of local checks", "interpretation": "Governance/evidence-handling metric; it does not score human worth, transfer authority, or establish production safety.", "current_state": "local_repository_run_only", "watershed_ids": [ "W18", "W21", "W22" ], "thresholds": [], "measurement_rule": "Re-run scripts/run-v018-local-properties.py and compare the run record.", "strengthening_signal": "Required state and limitations remain explicit and independently reviewable.", "weakening_signal": "Unknown, authority, history, or dependency state is collapsed into success.", "data_limitations": "Current release provides definitions and bounded local repository evidence only." }, { "id": "I92", "name": "Operator Contract Distinctness", "definition": "Share of operator profiles with materially distinct authority, purpose, retention, disclosure, correction and appeal conditions.", "unit": "Percent of contracts", "interpretation": "Governance and evidence-handling metric; it does not score human worth or establish external validity.", "current_state": "repository_local_wip", "watershed_ids": [ "W18", "W21", "W22" ], "thresholds": [], "measurement_rule": "Validate six contracts against distinct-policy and typed-actor rules.", "strengthening_signal": "Typed states, evidence paths, limitations and nonreachability remain explicit.", "weakening_signal": "Missing evidence, dissent, authority, rights or irreversible effects are normalized into success.", "data_limitations": "This WIP lineage-recovery branch locally evaluates repository-owned synthetic fixtures. It does not supply the missing sealed v0.19/v0.20 lineage, external execution, production migration, legal authority, institutional adoption, participant-study evidence, independent certification or deployment." }, { "id": "I93", "name": "Adversarial Portability Trial Coverage", "definition": "Share of required portability failure modes represented by definition fixtures and identified local executions.", "unit": "Percent of required trial classes", "interpretation": "Governance and evidence-handling metric; it does not score human worth or establish external validity.", "current_state": "repository_local_wip", "watershed_ids": [ "W18", "W21", "W22" ], "thresholds": [], "measurement_rule": "Run the v0.21 engine and compare all 18 trial outcomes to canonical expectations.", "strengthening_signal": "Typed states, evidence paths, limitations and nonreachability remain explicit.", "weakening_signal": "Missing evidence, dissent, authority, rights or irreversible effects are normalized into success.", "data_limitations": "This WIP lineage-recovery branch locally evaluates repository-owned synthetic fixtures. It does not supply the missing sealed v0.19/v0.20 lineage, external execution, production migration, legal authority, institutional adoption, participant-study evidence, independent certification or deployment." }, { "id": "I94", "name": "Live Challenge Preservation", "definition": "Share of challenge paths that retain contested, missing-evidence, review-unavailable and unresolved states without confidence-score override.", "unit": "Percent of challenge fixtures", "interpretation": "Governance and evidence-handling metric; it does not score human worth or establish external validity.", "current_state": "repository_local_wip", "watershed_ids": [ "W18", "W21", "W22" ], "thresholds": [], "measurement_rule": "Validate all allowed paths and reject every declared invalid transition.", "strengthening_signal": "Typed states, evidence paths, limitations and nonreachability remain explicit.", "weakening_signal": "Missing evidence, dissent, authority, rights or irreversible effects are normalized into success.", "data_limitations": "This WIP lineage-recovery branch locally evaluates repository-owned synthetic fixtures. It does not supply the missing sealed v0.19/v0.20 lineage, external execution, production migration, legal authority, institutional adoption, participant-study evidence, independent certification or deployment." }, { "id": "I95", "name": "Correction Dissemination Reach", "definition": "Share of known reachable dependents notified while nonresponse and nonreachability remain explicit.", "unit": "Percent of known graph targets", "interpretation": "Governance and evidence-handling metric; it does not score human worth or establish external validity.", "current_state": "repository_local_wip", "watershed_ids": [ "W18", "W21", "W22" ], "thresholds": [], "measurement_rule": "Traverse the canonical correction graph and retain unreachable nodes as residual error.", "strengthening_signal": "Typed states, evidence paths, limitations and nonreachability remain explicit.", "weakening_signal": "Missing evidence, dissent, authority, rights or irreversible effects are normalized into success.", "data_limitations": "This WIP lineage-recovery branch locally evaluates repository-owned synthetic fixtures. It does not supply the missing sealed v0.19/v0.20 lineage, external execution, production migration, legal authority, institutional adoption, participant-study evidence, independent certification or deployment." }, { "id": "I96", "name": "Rollback Claim Honesty", "definition": "Share of rollback templates whose claimed completeness is consistent with their effect class and proof obligations.", "unit": "Percent of receipt templates", "interpretation": "Governance and evidence-handling metric; it does not score human worth or establish external validity.", "current_state": "repository_local_wip", "watershed_ids": [ "W18", "W21", "W22" ], "thresholds": [], "measurement_rule": "Reject complete claims for compensable, disclose-only or irreversible effects.", "strengthening_signal": "Typed states, evidence paths, limitations and nonreachability remain explicit.", "weakening_signal": "Missing evidence, dissent, authority, rights or irreversible effects are normalized into success.", "data_limitations": "This WIP lineage-recovery branch locally evaluates repository-owned synthetic fixtures. It does not supply the missing sealed v0.19/v0.20 lineage, external execution, production migration, legal authority, institutional adoption, participant-study evidence, independent certification or deployment." }, { "id": "I97", "name": "Disclosure Minimization Coverage", "definition": "Share of disclosure demonstrations that enforce role, purpose and field minimization or fail explicitly when a requested primitive is absent.", "unit": "Percent of demonstrations", "interpretation": "Governance and evidence-handling metric; it does not score human worth or establish external validity.", "current_state": "repository_local_wip", "watershed_ids": [ "W18", "W21", "W22" ], "thresholds": [], "measurement_rule": "Execute all disclosure fixtures and compare disclosed fields and blocked claims.", "strengthening_signal": "Typed states, evidence paths, limitations and nonreachability remain explicit.", "weakening_signal": "Missing evidence, dissent, authority, rights or irreversible effects are normalized into success.", "data_limitations": "This WIP lineage-recovery branch locally evaluates repository-owned synthetic fixtures. It does not supply the missing sealed v0.19/v0.20 lineage, external execution, production migration, legal authority, institutional adoption, participant-study evidence, independent certification or deployment." }, { "id": "I98", "name": "Tamper Detector Independence", "definition": "Share of distinct negative controls that execute their intended mutation and fail for the required reason.", "unit": "Percent of detectors", "interpretation": "Governance and evidence-handling metric; it does not score human worth or establish external validity.", "current_state": "repository_local_wip", "watershed_ids": [ "W18", "W21", "W22" ], "thresholds": [], "measurement_rule": "Execute all 18 detector functions and inspect mutation-specific failure reasons.", "strengthening_signal": "Typed states, evidence paths, limitations and nonreachability remain explicit.", "weakening_signal": "Missing evidence, dissent, authority, rights or irreversible effects are normalized into success.", "data_limitations": "This WIP lineage-recovery branch locally evaluates repository-owned synthetic fixtures. It does not supply the missing sealed v0.19/v0.20 lineage, external execution, production migration, legal authority, institutional adoption, participant-study evidence, independent certification or deployment." }, { "id": "I99", "name": "Release-Lineage Completeness", "definition": "Share of mandatory predecessor packages and evidence artifacts present with exact verified hashes.", "unit": "Percent of required lineage artifacts", "interpretation": "Governance and evidence-handling metric; it does not score human worth or establish external validity.", "current_state": "repository_local_wip", "watershed_ids": [ "W18", "W21", "W22" ], "thresholds": [], "measurement_rule": "Compare the lineage lock to supplied sealed predecessor artifacts; missing v0.19/v0.20 packages block final authorization.", "strengthening_signal": "Typed states, evidence paths, limitations and nonreachability remain explicit.", "weakening_signal": "Missing evidence, dissent, authority, rights or irreversible effects are normalized into success.", "data_limitations": "This WIP lineage-recovery branch locally evaluates repository-owned synthetic fixtures. It does not supply the missing sealed v0.19/v0.20 lineage, external execution, production migration, legal authority, institutional adoption, participant-study evidence, independent certification or deployment." } ] }