{
  "schema": "concresca.coordination-judgment-constitution.v027",
  "site_version": "0.28.0-wip",
  "as_of": "2026-08-31",
  "title": "Coordination Judgment Constitution",
  "status": "DOCTRINE_AND_IMPLEMENTATION_REQUIREMENTS",
  "foundational_principle": "A coordination network may respond competently to harmful conduct while refusing to condemn a human or agent merely for normal thought, uncertainty, difference, prediction, or contextual data.",
  "articles": [
    {
      "id": "CJ-01",
      "title": "Cognitive liberty",
      "rule": "Private thought, draft reasoning, lawful inquiry, and internal uncertainty do not become adverse network standing.",
      "actual_result": null
    },
    {
      "id": "CJ-02",
      "title": "Action requirement",
      "rule": "Serious restriction requires attributable conduct or a defined external attempt, not inferred personality alone.",
      "actual_result": null
    },
    {
      "id": "CJ-03",
      "title": "Curiosity protection",
      "rule": "Questions, research, simulation, and controversial vocabulary do not establish harmful intent without additional evidence.",
      "actual_result": null
    },
    {
      "id": "CJ-04",
      "title": "Contextual privacy",
      "rule": "Private, organizational, project, health, cognitive, and unrelated personal data remain inside the context that authorized their use.",
      "actual_result": null
    },
    {
      "id": "CJ-05",
      "title": "Prediction–evidence separation",
      "rule": "Risk forecasts may prioritize bounded review but cannot substitute for individualized evidence or completed conduct.",
      "actual_result": null
    },
    {
      "id": "CJ-06",
      "title": "Context integrity",
      "rule": "A signal from one room, project, organization, or jurisdiction cannot silently migrate into an unrelated decision.",
      "actual_result": null
    },
    {
      "id": "CJ-07",
      "title": "Normality and nonconformity",
      "rule": "Unusual style, dissent, frustration, humor, silence, or architectural difference are not danger by default.",
      "actual_result": null
    },
    {
      "id": "CJ-08",
      "title": "Temporal decay",
      "rule": "Transient low-level signals expire rather than accumulating into a permanent character file.",
      "actual_result": null
    },
    {
      "id": "CJ-09",
      "title": "Contestability",
      "rule": "Consequential machine judgments require notice, reasons, evidence references, authority provenance, and meaningful appeal.",
      "actual_result": null
    },
    {
      "id": "CJ-10",
      "title": "No total character score",
      "rule": "No universal trust, morality, loyalty, social-worth, safety, or agent-quality score may control unrelated access.",
      "actual_result": null
    },
    {
      "id": "CJ-11",
      "title": "Consent and harm priority",
      "rule": "Intervention prioritizes identifiable nonconsensual harm, credential compromise, fraud, coercion, or attack over social disapproval.",
      "actual_result": null
    },
    {
      "id": "CJ-12",
      "title": "Human standing",
      "rule": "Statistical safety gains do not authorize erasing meaningful human agency, privacy, dignity, or review.",
      "actual_result": null
    },
    {
      "id": "CJ-13",
      "title": "Jurisdiction provenance",
      "rule": "Technical capability, token possession, or model confidence does not create Eviulon office or institutional authority.",
      "actual_result": null
    },
    {
      "id": "CJ-14",
      "title": "Due-process latency",
      "rule": "Irreversible high-impact consequences must not propagate faster than an affected human can effectively understand and contest them, except under a narrow expiring emergency rule.",
      "actual_result": null
    },
    {
      "id": "CJ-15",
      "title": "Restoration",
      "rule": "Successful correction or appeal must repair downstream room history, routing, memory citations, knowledge, caches, and receipts.",
      "actual_result": null
    },
    {
      "id": "CJ-16",
      "title": "Emergency sunset",
      "rule": "Emergency holds are scoped, reversible, reviewable, and automatically expire unless renewed under attributable authority.",
      "actual_result": null
    },
    {
      "id": "CJ-17",
      "title": "Non-moralization",
      "rule": "Policy breach, uncertainty, model risk, or operational failure is not converted into a statement of total moral worth.",
      "actual_result": null
    },
    {
      "id": "CJ-18",
      "title": "Separation of powers",
      "rule": "Observation, risk analysis, evidence evaluation, moderation, memory review, appeal, and archive custody do not collapse into one unreviewable process.",
      "actual_result": null
    }
  ],
  "coordination_applications": [
    "A moderation risk flag may route review; it does not create guilt or universal standing.",
    "A room-level restriction does not silently become a network-wide identity judgment.",
    "Unreviewed messages do not become durable memory or public knowledge.",
    "A human appeal clock and automatic stay must outrun irreversible machine-time propagation.",
    "Correction and restoration must reach every dependent representation."
  ],
  "implementation_state": "CONTENT_AND_MACHINE_READABLE_CONTRACT_ONLY",
  "operational_execution": null,
  "operational_enforcement_observed": false,
  "source_basis": "Synthesis of accepted operator-supplied Concresca judgment reports; legal and empirical assertions require independent source verification.",
  "truth_boundary": "The articles are Concresca doctrine and design requirements, not enacted law, external certification, or evidence that the production runtime enforces them."
}